Kontrola odluke o izboru na sudijsku funkciju u postupku pred Ustavnim sudom

The purpose of this paper was to tackle the principle of adversariness in the proceedings before the Serbian Constitutional Court. Two applications have been filed to the European Court of Human Rights because of inability of the applicants to participate in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court in which final judgments in their favour were quashed. The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the Constitutional Court had failed to inform them of the constitutional appeals lodged against the judgments in their favour and that, as a result, they had not had an opportunity to participate effectively in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. According to the case law of European Court of Human Rights the principle of adversariness in court proceedings also includes the proceedings before Constitutional Court. Since the applicants were not provided with an opportunity to participate effectively in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court, there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on this account. In future Serbian Constitutional Court would have to secure the application of adversariness principle in the proceedings instigated by constitutional appeals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_25107a
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kontrola odluke o izboru na sudijsku funkciju u postupku pred Ustavnim sudom

Nikola Bodiroga
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Kontrola odluke o izboru na sudijsku funkciju u postupku pred Ustavnim sudom

Nikola Bodiroga
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to tackle the principle of adversariness in the proceedings before the Serbian Constitutional Court. Two applications have been filed to the European Court of Human Rights because of inability of the applicants to participate in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court in which final judgments in their favour were quashed. The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the Constitutional Court had failed to inform them of the constitutional appeals lodged against the judgments in their favour and that, as a result, they had not had an opportunity to participate effectively in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. According to the case law of European Court of Human Rights the principle of adversariness in court proceedings also includes the proceedings before Constitutional Court. Since the applicants were not provided with an opportunity to participate effectively in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court, there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on this account. In future Serbian Constitutional Court would have to secure the application of adversariness principle in the proceedings instigated by constitutional appeals.

Anali Pravnog fakulteta u BeograduVol. 73(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.