Keep calm and move on: ‘Good-enough’ processing of clausal constructions in Korean

The good-enough processing account maintains that the human parser favours cognitively less effortful parsing (a heuristic stream) over deep and costly parsing (an algorithmic stream) in real-time processing. This study investigates how the two parsing routes work for sentence comprehension in Korean, an understudied language for this topic, through two self-paced reading experiments. In Experiment 1, focusing on the suffixal passive, native Korean speakers show no significant difference in reading times at the verb region between the verb-initial and verb-final conditions. However, we find a significant by-condition difference in the spill-over region, with longer reading times for the verb-initial condition compared to the verb-final condition. Experiment 2, examining the morphological causative, we find constant reading times across both word-order conditions including at the spill-over region. These findings suggest an interplay between the two parsing routes, with heuristics taking precedence over algorithms when disequilibrium arises. This study's findings also shed light on how the operations of these two parsing streams are modulated by language-specific properties (e.g., word order, case-marking, verbal morphology) during sentence comprehension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104726
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keep calm and move on: ‘Good-enough’ processing of clausal constructions in Korean

Gyu‐Ho Shin, Chanyoung Lee
Acta Psychologica
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Keep calm and move on: ‘Good-enough’ processing of clausal constructions in Korean

Gyu‐Ho Shin, Chanyoung Lee
article en

Abstract

The good-enough processing account maintains that the human parser favours cognitively less effortful parsing (a heuristic stream) over deep and costly parsing (an algorithmic stream) in real-time processing. This study investigates how the two parsing routes work for sentence comprehension in Korean, an understudied language for this topic, through two self-paced reading experiments. In Experiment 1, focusing on the suffixal passive, native Korean speakers show no significant difference in reading times at the verb region between the verb-initial and verb-final conditions. However, we find a significant by-condition difference in the spill-over region, with longer reading times for the verb-initial condition compared to the verb-final condition. Experiment 2, examining the morphological causative, we find constant reading times across both word-order conditions including at the spill-over region. These findings suggest an interplay between the two parsing routes, with heuristics taking precedence over algorithms when disequilibrium arises. This study's findings also shed light on how the operations of these two parsing streams are modulated by language-specific properties (e.g., word order, case-marking, verbal morphology) during sentence comprehension.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 255
Center for Applied Linguistics (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), The Society of Korean Language and Literature (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Keep calm and move on: ‘Good-enough’ processing of clausal constructions in Korean — Gyu‐Ho Shin, Chanyoung Lee · Acta Psychologica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS