Comparative Analysis of Pasture Composition: <scp>DNA</scp> Metabarcoding Versus Quadrat‐Based Botanical Surveys in Experimental Grassland Plots

DNA metabarcoding provides a scalable alternative to traditional botanical surveys, which are often time-consuming and reliant on taxonomic expertise. Here, we compare DNA metabarcoding with quadrat-based botanical surveys to assess plant species composition in experimental grassland plots under four defoliation regimes (continuous grazing, rotational grazing, frequent cutting and conservation cutting). Botanical surveys identified 16 taxa, while metabarcoding detected 25 taxa, including the dominant species <i>Holcus lanatus</i> and <i>Lolium perenne</i>. Despite detecting more taxa, there were some discrepancies in identification, with the sequence data only able to resolve some taxa at the genus level (e.g., <i>Agrostis</i> spp. instead of <i>Agrostis capillaris</i>) and potential species misidentifications (e.g., <i>Cardaminopsis helleri</i> vs. <i>Cardamine flexuosa</i>). However, both methods provided comparable results and revealed statistically significant differences in species composition between treatments, with higher diversity in cut versus grazed plots. The semi-quantitative nature of metabarcoding limits its capacity to accurately reflect species abundance, posing challenges for ecological interpretations where precise quantification is required. However, it provides a broader view of biodiversity and can complement traditional methods, offering new opportunities for efficient biodiversity monitoring. The findings support the integration of DNA metabarcoding into biodiversity assessments, particularly when used alongside traditional techniques. Further refinement of bioinformatics tools and reference databases will enhance their accuracy and reliability, enabling more effective monitoring of grassland biodiversity and sustainable management practices. This study highlights DNA metabarcoding as a valuable tool for understanding plant community responses to management interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71195
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Pasture Composition: DNA Metabarcoding Versus Quadrat‐Based Botanical Surveys in Experimental Grassland Plots

M. D. Fraser, Jan Titěra, Helen Hipperson, Hannah Vallin et al.
4 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
article

Comparative Analysis of Pasture Composition: DNA Metabarcoding Versus Quadrat‐Based Botanical Surveys in Experimental Grassland Plots

M. D. Fraser, Jan Titěra, Helen Hipperson, Hannah Vallin, Laura Jones
article en
4 citations

Abstract

DNA metabarcoding provides a scalable alternative to traditional botanical surveys, which are often time-consuming and reliant on taxonomic expertise. Here, we compare DNA metabarcoding with quadrat-based botanical surveys to assess plant species composition in experimental grassland plots under four defoliation regimes (continuous grazing, rotational grazing, frequent cutting and conservation cutting). Botanical surveys identified 16 taxa, while metabarcoding detected 25 taxa, including the dominant species <i>Holcus lanatus</i> and <i>Lolium perenne</i>. Despite detecting more taxa, there were some discrepancies in identification, with the sequence data only able to resolve some taxa at the genus level (e.g., <i>Agrostis</i> spp. instead of <i>Agrostis capillaris</i>) and potential species misidentifications (e.g., <i>Cardaminopsis helleri</i> vs. <i>Cardamine flexuosa</i>). However, both methods provided comparable results and revealed statistically significant differences in species composition between treatments, with higher diversity in cut versus grazed plots. The semi-quantitative nature of metabarcoding limits its capacity to accurately reflect species abundance, posing challenges for ecological interpretations where precise quantification is required. However, it provides a broader view of biodiversity and can complement traditional methods, offering new opportunities for efficient biodiversity monitoring. The findings support the integration of DNA metabarcoding into biodiversity assessments, particularly when used alongside traditional techniques. Further refinement of bioinformatics tools and reference databases will enhance their accuracy and reliability, enabling more effective monitoring of grassland biodiversity and sustainable management practices. This study highlights DNA metabarcoding as a valuable tool for understanding plant community responses to management interventions.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(4)
Technical University of Liberec (CZ), Aberystwyth University (GB), National Botanic Garden of Wales (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.