Access and benefit sharing biological materials for machines: Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning

Societal Impact Statement Future research and development of biological materials for foods, feeds, fibres, materials and medicines will increasingly rely on information and knowledge using Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for detecting patterns to make useful decisions. The access and use of this information and knowledge is increasingly being regulated under international laws according to an ideal that delivers money and other benefits from the uses of the information and knowledge. We conclude these issues will require specific attention to ensure the ideals of fair and equitable benefit sharing are sustainable and can deliver real benefits. Summary The global regulation of access and benefit sharing (ABS) biological materials is starting to impose complex rules for governing information and knowledge about those materials. Artificial Intelligence (AI) poses existential challenges for the research and development of those materials for foods, feeds, fibres, materials and medicines under these ABS schemes. We speculate these challenges are in three distinct scenarios: (1) data used to train the AI models; (2) data used to test (and verify) the AI models; and (3) data used in applying the models to reveal useful patterns. Building in ‘explainability’ to the AI algorithms may be a solution, at least in part, to delivering on fair and equitable ABS. We then posit two issues for ABS: (1) negotiating the ownership status to use the input data with each data owner for training, testing (and verifying) and using the models (although a further complication here is that most data is without an owner because it is already open and free as a public domain without intellectual property restrictions); and (2) following the data per se through the AI models (explainability). We conclude that how ABS will be addressed in developing and applying AI models will require careful consideration to avoid the apparent dulling effects of current ABS regulation and the potentially significant consequences this may have for biology‐based research and the commercialisation of biology‐based products and services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants People Planet
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.70007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access and benefit sharing biological materials for machines: Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning

Michelle Rourke, Charles Lawson, Elizabeth Englezos
1 citations
Plants People Planet
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Access and benefit sharing biological materials for machines: Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning

Michelle Rourke, Charles Lawson, Elizabeth Englezos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Societal Impact Statement Future research and development of biological materials for foods, feeds, fibres, materials and medicines will increasingly rely on information and knowledge using Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for detecting patterns to make useful decisions. The access and use of this information and knowledge is increasingly being regulated under international laws according to an ideal that delivers money and other benefits from the uses of the information and knowledge. We conclude these issues will require specific attention to ensure the ideals of fair and equitable benefit sharing are sustainable and can deliver real benefits. Summary The global regulation of access and benefit sharing (ABS) biological materials is starting to impose complex rules for governing information and knowledge about those materials. Artificial Intelligence (AI) poses existential challenges for the research and development of those materials for foods, feeds, fibres, materials and medicines under these ABS schemes. We speculate these challenges are in three distinct scenarios: (1) data used to train the AI models; (2) data used to test (and verify) the AI models; and (3) data used in applying the models to reveal useful patterns. Building in ‘explainability’ to the AI algorithms may be a solution, at least in part, to delivering on fair and equitable ABS. We then posit two issues for ABS: (1) negotiating the ownership status to use the input data with each data owner for training, testing (and verifying) and using the models (although a further complication here is that most data is without an owner because it is already open and free as a public domain without intellectual property restrictions); and (2) following the data per se through the AI models (explainability). We conclude that how ABS will be addressed in developing and applying AI models will require careful consideration to avoid the apparent dulling effects of current ABS regulation and the potentially significant consequences this may have for biology‐based research and the commercialisation of biology‐based products and services.

Plants People PlanetVol. 7(5)
Griffith University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.