PUBLIC HEALTH PROCUREMENT PROJECT PERFORMANCE- A POLICY FRAMWORK FOR HEALTH SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Abstract Background: Public procurement in the healthcare sector is a crucial function that ensures efficient resource utilization while maintaining transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Procurement performance is influenced by various factors, including staff competencies, planning efficiency, and governance structures. Understanding the relationship between procurement practices and project outcomes is essential for improving efficiency in public health supply chains. However, the moderating roles of contract governance and trust in procurement performance remain underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of procurement management practices on public procurement project performance, with a focus on staff competency and procurement planning. Objective: To assess the influence of staff competencies and procurement planning on public procurement project performance and examine the moderating effects of trust and contract governance in the healthcare sector of Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 procurement professionals working in the healthcare sector, with 183 valid responses analyzed. The study employed a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, multiple linear regression, and moderation analysis. Normality, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity assumptions were tested. The significance of relationships was determined at p < 0.05. Results: Staff competency demonstrated a significant but partial positive impact on public procurement project performance (β = 0.186, p = 0.012), while IT competency showed no significant effect (β = 0.048, p = 0.404). Procurement planning did not significantly influence performance (β = 0.092, p = 0.231). Trust negatively moderated the relationship between staff competency and procurement performance (β = -0.2299, p = 0.0001), reducing the effect of competencies as trust increased. Contract governance did not significantly moderate any relationship. The model explained 40.1% of variance in procurement performance (R² = 0.401). Conclusion: Staff competency plays a crucial role in procurement performance, but excessive reliance on trust can diminish its effectiveness. Procurement planning requires structural improvements, including budgetary consistency and timely allocation, to enhance its impact. Strengthening training programs and implementing e-procurement systems can improve procurement efficiency in the healthcare sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Life and Social Sciences
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/tzfr6698
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PUBLIC HEALTH PROCUREMENT PROJECT PERFORMANCE- A POLICY FRAMWORK FOR HEALTH SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Shamshad Akram, Sidra Batool, Muhammad Umair Akram, Rasain Latif et al.
Insights-Journal of Life and Social Sciences
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

PUBLIC HEALTH PROCUREMENT PROJECT PERFORMANCE- A POLICY FRAMWORK FOR HEALTH SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

Shamshad Akram, Sidra Batool, Muhammad Umair Akram, Rasain Latif, Faiza Batool
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Public procurement in the healthcare sector is a crucial function that ensures efficient resource utilization while maintaining transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Procurement performance is influenced by various factors, including staff competencies, planning efficiency, and governance structures. Understanding the relationship between procurement practices and project outcomes is essential for improving efficiency in public health supply chains. However, the moderating roles of contract governance and trust in procurement performance remain underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of procurement management practices on public procurement project performance, with a focus on staff competency and procurement planning. Objective: To assess the influence of staff competencies and procurement planning on public procurement project performance and examine the moderating effects of trust and contract governance in the healthcare sector of Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 procurement professionals working in the healthcare sector, with 183 valid responses analyzed. The study employed a structured questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, multiple linear regression, and moderation analysis. Normality, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity assumptions were tested. The significance of relationships was determined at p < 0.05. Results: Staff competency demonstrated a significant but partial positive impact on public procurement project performance (β = 0.186, p = 0.012), while IT competency showed no significant effect (β = 0.048, p = 0.404). Procurement planning did not significantly influence performance (β = 0.092, p = 0.231). Trust negatively moderated the relationship between staff competency and procurement performance (β = -0.2299, p = 0.0001), reducing the effect of competencies as trust increased. Contract governance did not significantly moderate any relationship. The model explained 40.1% of variance in procurement performance (R² = 0.401). Conclusion: Staff competency plays a crucial role in procurement performance, but excessive reliance on trust can diminish its effectiveness. Procurement planning requires structural improvements, including budgetary consistency and timely allocation, to enhance its impact. Strengthening training programs and implementing e-procurement systems can improve procurement efficiency in the healthcare sector.

Insights-Journal of Life and Social SciencesVol. 3(2)
Higher Education Commission (PK), Management Sciences for Health (US), Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.