Gray-body factors: Method matters

The calculation of gray-body factors is essential for understanding Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics. While the formalism developed by Chandrasekhar is effective for static black holes, it faces significant challenges in Kerr spacetimes, particularly in the superradiant regime, where a specific choice of coordinates introduces numerical inaccuracies. To address these limitations, an alternative method based on re-scaling radial coordinates and employing Frobenius-like expansions has been investigated. We compare the gray-body factors obtained for a near-maximally rotating black hole using both methods and find that the Chandrasekhar formalism systematically overestimates the values in the superradiant regime compared to well-established analytical results. Specifically, for a spin parameter of a ∗ = 0 . 999 , the Chandrasekhar method yields values approximately twice as large as the correct result. Since this approach has been implemented in BlackHawk , we assess the impact of these discrepancies on constraints derived from gamma-ray observations of highly spinning primordial black holes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of the Dark Universe
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101903
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gray-body factors: Method matters

Alexandre Arbey, Yuber F. Perez-Gonzalez, Marco Calzà
5 citations
Physics of the Dark Universe
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
5.77
article

Gray-body factors: Method matters

Alexandre Arbey, Yuber F. Perez-Gonzalez, Marco Calzà
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The calculation of gray-body factors is essential for understanding Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics. While the formalism developed by Chandrasekhar is effective for static black holes, it faces significant challenges in Kerr spacetimes, particularly in the superradiant regime, where a specific choice of coordinates introduces numerical inaccuracies. To address these limitations, an alternative method based on re-scaling radial coordinates and employing Frobenius-like expansions has been investigated. We compare the gray-body factors obtained for a near-maximally rotating black hole using both methods and find that the Chandrasekhar formalism systematically overestimates the values in the superradiant regime compared to well-established analytical results. Specifically, for a spin parameter of a ∗ = 0 . 999 , the Chandrasekhar method yields values approximately twice as large as the correct result. Since this approach has been implemented in BlackHawk , we assess the impact of these discrepancies on constraints derived from gamma-ray observations of highly spinning primordial black holes.

Physics of the Dark UniverseVol. 48
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Trento (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics And Applications (IT), Institut de Physique (FR), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules (FR), Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis de Lyon (FR), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gray-body factors: Method matters — Alexandre Arbey, Yuber F. Perez-Gonzalez, et al. · Physics of the Dark Universe (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS