Non‐GAAP Reporting Decisions and the Enhanced Fraud Triangle: The Role of Capability

ABSTRACT Based on an experiment with 92 US public company financial executives, we use the enhanced fraud triangle framework (pressure, opportunity and capability) to understand controllers' response to CFO pressure to opportunistically manipulate non‐GAAP earnings. Overall, we find that capability factors are associated with controllers' behaviour in our experimental setting, with some evidence of pressure effects as well. Specifically, we find that controller bonus type, perceptions of the CEO's role in pressure from the CFO, the perceived ethicality of the action, the fairness of the decision process and whether participants have seen a similar situation in practice are significantly related to controllers' decisions. Overall, our results and other recent research findings point to the important role of capability in understanding and assessing fraud risk. We hope that the findings will be useful to auditors, and we encourage auditing standard setters to consider emphasizing capability in their fraud‐related standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Auditing
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12377
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐GAAP Reporting Decisions and the Enhanced Fraud Triangle: The Role of Capability

Velina Popova, Valerie Simmons, Dana R. Hermanson
2 citations
International Journal of Auditing
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
article

Non‐GAAP Reporting Decisions and the Enhanced Fraud Triangle: The Role of Capability

Velina Popova, Valerie Simmons, Dana R. Hermanson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Based on an experiment with 92 US public company financial executives, we use the enhanced fraud triangle framework (pressure, opportunity and capability) to understand controllers' response to CFO pressure to opportunistically manipulate non‐GAAP earnings. Overall, we find that capability factors are associated with controllers' behaviour in our experimental setting, with some evidence of pressure effects as well. Specifically, we find that controller bonus type, perceptions of the CEO's role in pressure from the CFO, the perceived ethicality of the action, the fairness of the decision process and whether participants have seen a similar situation in practice are significantly related to controllers' decisions. Overall, our results and other recent research findings point to the important role of capability in understanding and assessing fraud risk. We hope that the findings will be useful to auditors, and we encourage auditing standard setters to consider emphasizing capability in their fraud‐related standards.

International Journal of AuditingVol. 29(3)
Kennesaw State University (US), University of West Florida (US)
University of Southern Mississippi, Kennesaw State University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.