What network and performance indicators can tell us about supply chain and sourcing resilience (and what they cannot)

Supply chain (SC) resilience takes network connectivity and performance persistence perspectives, which supplement each other. The extant literature has developed a large body of knowledge about SC resilience's network and performance indicators. However, we are unaware of any published research combining these two perspectives in resilience assessment. Therefore, this study aims to advance our understanding of how network and performance indicators can mutually enhance each other when analysing SC resilience as both a system property (quality) and an outcome (quantity). The unique contribution of our study is a combined use of network science and discrete-event simulation allowing for mixed-method grounded integration of static and dynamic views of supply chain resilience. Using node degrees as network indicators and on-time delivery, fulfilment rate, and time-to-recovery as performance indicators, we examine reactions of these indicators to a disruption to the sourcing strategies of three different flexibility degrees. We observe that network science methods can be used to identify disruption existence while simulation methods allow quantifying performance impact. We show how and when the combined application of network and performance indicators can inform decision-makers about SC resilience, and propose a generalised guideline for a practical implementation of the developed approach. Our main conclusion is that SC resilience-assessment models can be mutually enhanced by including network characteristics and process dynamics through a combination of network analysis and simulation. • We examine a combination of both network and performance indicators in resilience analysis. • Sourcing strategies of three different flexibility degrees are tested. • We show what information each of the indicators can provide for resilience analysis. • We consider both network and process dynamics in resilience assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2025.101014
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What network and performance indicators can tell us about supply chain and sourcing resilience (and what they cannot)

Dmitry Ivanov
14 citations
Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
31.17
article

What network and performance indicators can tell us about supply chain and sourcing resilience (and what they cannot)

Dmitry Ivanov
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Supply chain (SC) resilience takes network connectivity and performance persistence perspectives, which supplement each other. The extant literature has developed a large body of knowledge about SC resilience's network and performance indicators. However, we are unaware of any published research combining these two perspectives in resilience assessment. Therefore, this study aims to advance our understanding of how network and performance indicators can mutually enhance each other when analysing SC resilience as both a system property (quality) and an outcome (quantity). The unique contribution of our study is a combined use of network science and discrete-event simulation allowing for mixed-method grounded integration of static and dynamic views of supply chain resilience. Using node degrees as network indicators and on-time delivery, fulfilment rate, and time-to-recovery as performance indicators, we examine reactions of these indicators to a disruption to the sourcing strategies of three different flexibility degrees. We observe that network science methods can be used to identify disruption existence while simulation methods allow quantifying performance impact. We show how and when the combined application of network and performance indicators can inform decision-makers about SC resilience, and propose a generalised guideline for a practical implementation of the developed approach. Our main conclusion is that SC resilience-assessment models can be mutually enhanced by including network characteristics and process dynamics through a combination of network analysis and simulation. • We examine a combination of both network and performance indicators in resilience analysis. • Sourcing strategies of three different flexibility degrees are tested. • We show what information each of the indicators can provide for resilience analysis. • We consider both network and process dynamics in resilience assessment.

Journal of Purchasing and Supply ManagementVol. 31(3)
Berlin School of Economics and Law (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Excellent Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
31.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.