Could the new eco schemes replace the long-known agri-environmental measures? Evidence from two labeled discrete choice experiments

In the context of the most recent reform of the European Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027), new voluntary environment-friendly measures have been introduced. These measures, termed eco-schemes, represent one-year arrangements with limited restrictions. They are, therefore, considered to be more flexible than the revised and more demanding agri-environment-climate measures (AECM). The introduction of the new eco-schemes, alongside the AECM, raises questions regarding 1) the acceptance of eco-schemes by farmers, and 2) the impact on adoption of AECM. Would farmers prefer to continue with familiar measures or opt for the new, less restrictive, and shorter eco-schemes? To address these questions, two discrete choice experiments (a stated preference method) were conducted on a sample of 360 farmers with previous AECM experience. These experiments focus exclusively on grassland-related measures, as they are available in both contract forms, eco-schemes and AECM. The results reveal a general aversion to voluntary agri-environmental measures. However, farmers are more inclined to implement the new eco-schemes rather than the more familiar AECM, especially when the compensation of the latter is conditional on the environmental results. The findings also emphasize the impact of restrictions and the flexibility of the contract on farmers’ decision-making processes, particularly when dealing with result-based AECM. • Farmers generally show reluctance to adopt voluntary agri-environmental measures introduced under the 2023 CAP reform. • Eco-schemes are preferred over AECM following the 2023 CAP reform. • Farmers strongly oppose restrictions on fertilizers and herbicides in the new measures. • Flexibility in contract terms, especially in control measures, is crucial for the adoption of result-based AECM. • Tailored policies are needed to address the considerable heterogeneity in farmers' preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107525
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could the new eco schemes replace the long-known agri-environmental measures? Evidence from two labeled discrete choice experiments

Lysander Fockaert, Sophie Van Schoubroeck, Soukaina Anougmar, Steven Van Passel et al.
7 citations
Land Use Policy
Economic and Environmental Valuation
21.92
article

Could the new eco schemes replace the long-known agri-environmental measures? Evidence from two labeled discrete choice experiments

Lysander Fockaert, Sophie Van Schoubroeck, Soukaina Anougmar, Steven Van Passel, Karolien Michiel
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In the context of the most recent reform of the European Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027), new voluntary environment-friendly measures have been introduced. These measures, termed eco-schemes, represent one-year arrangements with limited restrictions. They are, therefore, considered to be more flexible than the revised and more demanding agri-environment-climate measures (AECM). The introduction of the new eco-schemes, alongside the AECM, raises questions regarding 1) the acceptance of eco-schemes by farmers, and 2) the impact on adoption of AECM. Would farmers prefer to continue with familiar measures or opt for the new, less restrictive, and shorter eco-schemes? To address these questions, two discrete choice experiments (a stated preference method) were conducted on a sample of 360 farmers with previous AECM experience. These experiments focus exclusively on grassland-related measures, as they are available in both contract forms, eco-schemes and AECM. The results reveal a general aversion to voluntary agri-environmental measures. However, farmers are more inclined to implement the new eco-schemes rather than the more familiar AECM, especially when the compensation of the latter is conditional on the environmental results. The findings also emphasize the impact of restrictions and the flexibility of the contract on farmers’ decision-making processes, particularly when dealing with result-based AECM. • Farmers generally show reluctance to adopt voluntary agri-environmental measures introduced under the 2023 CAP reform. • Eco-schemes are preferred over AECM following the 2023 CAP reform. • Farmers strongly oppose restrictions on fertilizers and herbicides in the new measures. • Flexibility in contract terms, especially in control measures, is crucial for the adoption of result-based AECM. • Tailored policies are needed to address the considerable heterogeneity in farmers' preferences.

Land Use PolicyVol. 153
Flemish Government (BE), Antwerp Management School (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
21.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.