Health professionals' knowledge and attitude towards patient confidentiality and associated factors.

Objective: To evaluate health professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and related variables regarding patient confidentiality. Study Design: Institution Based Cross-sectional study. Setting: Gomal Medical College Affiliated Hospitals. Period: June-September 2024. Methods: Using the stratified random sampling approach, 213 people made up the sample. Bi-variate and multi-variate binary logistic regression analyses were done. Odds ratio, with 95% confidence level and P value were calculated. Results: Among 213 participants, 71.4% had good knowledge of confidentiality. Most of doctors 175(82.2%) said that the patients’ confidentiality should be maintained and governed by law. While 68.5% with satisfactory attitude towards patients’ confidentiality. Doctors working at positions of AP and above (AOR = 6.83 CI= [0.784-59.53]) have good knowledge about patient confidentiality. For factors associated with doctors’ attitude towards patient confidentiality, AP and above post level with (AOR=12.29, CI = [1.335-113.3]) have satisfactory attitude towards patients’ confidentiality and was highly significant. Those having satisfactory knowledge with (AOR=0.275, CI= [0.141-0.538]) were highly significant for attitude. Conclusion: this study revealed that 71.4% participant had satisfactory knowledge and 68.5% had satisfactory attitude towards patient confidentiality and those having satisfactory knowledge of confidentiality had satisfactory attitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Professional Medical Journal
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2025.32.04.8397
Primary Topic
Patient Dignity and Privacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health professionals' knowledge and attitude towards patient confidentiality and associated factors.

Mohiyuddin Khan, Mohsin Shah, Ahmed Mustafà, Samina Amin Qadir et al.
The Professional Medical Journal
Patient Dignity and Privacy
article

Health professionals' knowledge and attitude towards patient confidentiality and associated factors.

Mohiyuddin Khan, Mohsin Shah, Ahmed Mustafà, Samina Amin Qadir, Fazal Ur Rehman, Nawazish Ali, Mohammad Osama, Anil Iqbal
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate health professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and related variables regarding patient confidentiality. Study Design: Institution Based Cross-sectional study. Setting: Gomal Medical College Affiliated Hospitals. Period: June-September 2024. Methods: Using the stratified random sampling approach, 213 people made up the sample. Bi-variate and multi-variate binary logistic regression analyses were done. Odds ratio, with 95% confidence level and P value were calculated. Results: Among 213 participants, 71.4% had good knowledge of confidentiality. Most of doctors 175(82.2%) said that the patients’ confidentiality should be maintained and governed by law. While 68.5% with satisfactory attitude towards patients’ confidentiality. Doctors working at positions of AP and above (AOR = 6.83 CI= [0.784-59.53]) have good knowledge about patient confidentiality. For factors associated with doctors’ attitude towards patient confidentiality, AP and above post level with (AOR=12.29, CI = [1.335-113.3]) have satisfactory attitude towards patients’ confidentiality and was highly significant. Those having satisfactory knowledge with (AOR=0.275, CI= [0.141-0.538]) were highly significant for attitude. Conclusion: this study revealed that 71.4% participant had satisfactory knowledge and 68.5% had satisfactory attitude towards patient confidentiality and those having satisfactory knowledge of confidentiality had satisfactory attitudes.

The Professional Medical JournalVol. 32(04)
Gomal University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Patient Dignity and Privacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.