Efficacy of baits and lures for weasel detection

Abstract Small mustelids are difficult to survey due to their low density and cryptic nature. Population status of North American weasels ( Mustela erminea , Mustela nivalis , and Neogale frenata ) are believed to be in decline, but there are no standardized monitoring protocols to evaluate their status. To support weasel monitoring, we compared the attractiveness of various combinations of baits and lures to weasels in sites located throughout the eastern and central USA. We baited a total of 122 clusters of 4 camera traps, across 14 states, with random combinations of 4 baits and 3 scent lures in the winters of 2022 and 2023. Cameras baited with meat were 3.5 times more likely to detect both short‐ and long‐tailed weasels on average (mean percentage of cameras detecting weasels: 20–30%) than those with scent lures (3–11%). Red meat was twice as effective at attracting short‐tailed weasels (50%) as chicken or cat food (20%; Z = 2.49, p < 0.01). While red meat marginally increased detections of long‐tailed weasels (21%) compared to chicken and cat food (19%), its effectiveness was influenced by whether the bait was stolen (Z = 2.08, p = 0.04). Additionally, long‐tailed weasels were detected in half the time when raw chicken was used (median days to detection: red meat = 39.5 days, raw chicken = 14.5 days). When salmon oil was added to meat bait, it increased the likelihood of detecting short‐tailed weasels and reduced the time to detection for both species. A variety of non‐target species stole meat bait during the survey, making the camera traps less effective. The addition of salmon oil may have allowed for continual attraction of weasels until stolen meat bait could be replenished. In summary, red meat was the best all‐purpose bait for weasels, although raw chicken is similarly effective for long‐tailed weasels, and the addition of salmon oil is helpful. We also recommend a specific bait enclosure design that was the most effective at minimizing theft of bait. We propose our baiting strategy can be used as a survey standard to evaluate the distribution and population status of weasels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1580
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of baits and lures for weasel detection

Scott M. Bergeson, Amanda E. Cheeseman, David S. Jachowski, Zach J. Farris et al.
4 citations
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
6.87
article

Efficacy of baits and lures for weasel detection

Scott M. Bergeson, Amanda E. Cheeseman, David S. Jachowski, Zach J. Farris, John D. Erb, Michael L. Fies, Lisa M. Smith, Markéta Zímová, Stacy R. Cotey, Roland Kays, Colleen Olfenbuttel, D. Sasse, Chad Williamson, Catherine Dennison, Joseph W. Butfiloski, Michael Joyce, Courtney D. Anderson, Joshua A. Tabora, Ashley Burket
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Small mustelids are difficult to survey due to their low density and cryptic nature. Population status of North American weasels ( Mustela erminea , Mustela nivalis , and Neogale frenata ) are believed to be in decline, but there are no standardized monitoring protocols to evaluate their status. To support weasel monitoring, we compared the attractiveness of various combinations of baits and lures to weasels in sites located throughout the eastern and central USA. We baited a total of 122 clusters of 4 camera traps, across 14 states, with random combinations of 4 baits and 3 scent lures in the winters of 2022 and 2023. Cameras baited with meat were 3.5 times more likely to detect both short‐ and long‐tailed weasels on average (mean percentage of cameras detecting weasels: 20–30%) than those with scent lures (3–11%). Red meat was twice as effective at attracting short‐tailed weasels (50%) as chicken or cat food (20%; Z = 2.49, p < 0.01). While red meat marginally increased detections of long‐tailed weasels (21%) compared to chicken and cat food (19%), its effectiveness was influenced by whether the bait was stolen (Z = 2.08, p = 0.04). Additionally, long‐tailed weasels were detected in half the time when raw chicken was used (median days to detection: red meat = 39.5 days, raw chicken = 14.5 days). When salmon oil was added to meat bait, it increased the likelihood of detecting short‐tailed weasels and reduced the time to detection for both species. A variety of non‐target species stole meat bait during the survey, making the camera traps less effective. The addition of salmon oil may have allowed for continual attraction of weasels until stolen meat bait could be replenished. In summary, red meat was the best all‐purpose bait for weasels, although raw chicken is similarly effective for long‐tailed weasels, and the addition of salmon oil is helpful. We also recommend a specific bait enclosure design that was the most effective at minimizing theft of bait. We propose our baiting strategy can be used as a survey standard to evaluate the distribution and population status of weasels.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(2)
Michigan Technological University (US), Indiana Department of Natural Resources (US), Ohio Department of Natural Resources (US), South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (US), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US), North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne (US), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (US), South Dakota State University (US), Maryland Department of Natural Resources (US), Ohio University (US), University of Minnesota, Duluth (US), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (FR), State Farm (United States) (US), Appalachian State University (US), The Ohio State University (US), Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (US), Clemson University (US), Minot State University (US)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.