The Importance of Thinking In-Place with ‘Vulnerable’ Neighbourhoods for Policy Making

Big data are increasingly being used to understand complex social and economic challenges. While there is much to be learned from such approaches, in-place data remain necessary for a multidimensional understanding of neighbourhoods, and for sustainable and socially just policies. Rather than reinforcing methodological divides, the argument we set forth in this paper is that multiple forms and strands of inquiry illuminate complexities of space, place and community. Decision makers should consider how and why they may privilege certain forms of data, and instead tap into diversified ways of knowing. We reflect on the challenges and opportunities of crafting in-place data as a relational process integral for decision makers and policymaking. To do so, we discuss two case studies in Sweden and The Netherlands that demonstrate the importance of widening the scope of knowledge, and a willingness to decentre singularity and homogenous definitions of community and place.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v17.i1.9336
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Thinking In-Place with ‘Vulnerable’ Neighbourhoods for Policy Making

Sofi Johansson, E.J. Veen, Natasha Alexandra Webster
Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary Journal
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

The Importance of Thinking In-Place with ‘Vulnerable’ Neighbourhoods for Policy Making

Sofi Johansson, E.J. Veen, Natasha Alexandra Webster
article en

Abstract

Big data are increasingly being used to understand complex social and economic challenges. While there is much to be learned from such approaches, in-place data remain necessary for a multidimensional understanding of neighbourhoods, and for sustainable and socially just policies. Rather than reinforcing methodological divides, the argument we set forth in this paper is that multiple forms and strands of inquiry illuminate complexities of space, place and community. Decision makers should consider how and why they may privilege certain forms of data, and instead tap into diversified ways of knowing. We reflect on the challenges and opportunities of crafting in-place data as a relational process integral for decision makers and policymaking. To do so, we discuss two case studies in Sweden and The Netherlands that demonstrate the importance of widening the scope of knowledge, and a willingness to decentre singularity and homogenous definitions of community and place.

Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary JournalVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Importance of Thinking In-Place with ‘Vulnerable’ Neighbourhoods for Policy Making — Sofi Johansson, E.J. Veen, et al. · Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS