Screening outcomes at second <scp>FIT</scp> screening in individuals with a first time negative <scp>FIT</scp>‐result or low‐risk adenomas: Results from a nationwide <scp>FIT</scp> screening program

In Denmark, participants in faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening with low-risk adenomas are recommended a return to biennial FIT-screening. However, they participate less than the FIT-negative group (FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative) at subsequent screening. Further, it is not clear how much this group benefits from the subsequent screening. We aimed at comparing the CRC incidence before and at the next screening (FIT<sub>2</sub>) in the low-risk group to that of those having a FIT-negative result at first time FIT-screening. In this register-based cohort study, we estimated the incidence of interval CRC (ICRC) and results of FIT<sub>2</sub>, including the FIT<sub>2</sub>-positivity rate and rate of screen detected CRC (SDCRC). Relative risk (RR) comparing the low-risk group to FIT<sub>1</sub>-negatives was estimated. Adjustment for age and sex was performed with binary regression and presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Incidence of ICRC was 0.17% and 0.08% in the Low-risk group and FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative group, respectively, RR 2.18 (95%CI 1.51; 3.16). After adjustment, RR was 1.76 (95%CI: 1.22; 2.55). The FIT<sub>2</sub>-positivity rate was 14.4% and 4.4% for the Low-risk group and FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative group, respectively. At FIT<sub>2</sub>-screening, the detection of SDCRC was 0.36% and 0.16% in the low-risk and FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative group, respectively, RR 2.27 (95%CI: 1.46; 3.54), adjusted 1.83 (95% CI: 1.17; 2.85). Despite a recent colonoscopy, participants having low-risk adenomas detected at first colonoscopy in FIT-screening remain at a higher short-term risk of ICRC and SDCRC compared to the FIT<sub>1</sub>-negatives. Continuous participation in FIT-screening is important for the Low-risk group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35419
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening outcomes at second FIT screening in individuals with a first time negative FIT‐result or low‐risk adenomas: Results from a nationwide FIT screening program

Sisse Helle Njor, Berit Andersen, Pernille Thordal Larsen, Susanne Fogh Jørgensen et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Screening outcomes at second FIT screening in individuals with a first time negative FIT‐result or low‐risk adenomas: Results from a nationwide FIT screening program

Sisse Helle Njor, Berit Andersen, Pernille Thordal Larsen, Susanne Fogh Jørgensen, Morten Rasmussen
article en

Abstract

In Denmark, participants in faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening with low-risk adenomas are recommended a return to biennial FIT-screening. However, they participate less than the FIT-negative group (FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative) at subsequent screening. Further, it is not clear how much this group benefits from the subsequent screening. We aimed at comparing the CRC incidence before and at the next screening (FIT<sub>2</sub>) in the low-risk group to that of those having a FIT-negative result at first time FIT-screening. In this register-based cohort study, we estimated the incidence of interval CRC (ICRC) and results of FIT<sub>2</sub>, including the FIT<sub>2</sub>-positivity rate and rate of screen detected CRC (SDCRC). Relative risk (RR) comparing the low-risk group to FIT<sub>1</sub>-negatives was estimated. Adjustment for age and sex was performed with binary regression and presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Incidence of ICRC was 0.17% and 0.08% in the Low-risk group and FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative group, respectively, RR 2.18 (95%CI 1.51; 3.16). After adjustment, RR was 1.76 (95%CI: 1.22; 2.55). The FIT<sub>2</sub>-positivity rate was 14.4% and 4.4% for the Low-risk group and FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative group, respectively. At FIT<sub>2</sub>-screening, the detection of SDCRC was 0.36% and 0.16% in the low-risk and FIT<sub>1</sub>-negative group, respectively, RR 2.27 (95%CI: 1.46; 3.54), adjusted 1.83 (95% CI: 1.17; 2.85). Despite a recent colonoscopy, participants having low-risk adenomas detected at first colonoscopy in FIT-screening remain at a higher short-term risk of ICRC and SDCRC compared to the FIT<sub>1</sub>-negatives. Continuous participation in FIT-screening is important for the Low-risk group.

International Journal of CancerVol. 157(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Bispebjerg Hospital (DK), Lillebaelt Hospital (DK), Regional Hospital Randers (DK)
Kræftens Bekæmpelse, Helsefonden, Harboefonden, Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansens Fond
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.