Individualism–collectivism and intergroup bias

Abstract The current article offers a focused review of the link between individualism‐collectivism (Ind‐Col) and intergroup bias. Despite the mutual relationship between culture and social groups, there remains a dearth of research that specifies cultural influence on intergroup behavior in general and intergroup favoritism in particular. Moreover, there is much confusion in the literature as to the role of Ind‐Col in the emergence and manifestation of intergroup bias. The confusion has been aggravated by the simplistic assumption that equates collectivism with the social identity processes that lead to undesirable consequences in intergroup settings. Drawing on the previous work that examined how Ind‐Col relates to intergroup bias at multiple levels, this review challenges the widely held expectation that collectivism is a conduit to various forms of intergroup bias and calls for research that takes into account the diverse viewpoints about the nature of group processes and intergroup behavior across cultures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal Of Social Psychology
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.70010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individualism–collectivism and intergroup bias

Hoon‐Seok Choi
2 citations
Asian Journal Of Social Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
4.88
article

Individualism–collectivism and intergroup bias

Hoon‐Seok Choi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The current article offers a focused review of the link between individualism‐collectivism (Ind‐Col) and intergroup bias. Despite the mutual relationship between culture and social groups, there remains a dearth of research that specifies cultural influence on intergroup behavior in general and intergroup favoritism in particular. Moreover, there is much confusion in the literature as to the role of Ind‐Col in the emergence and manifestation of intergroup bias. The confusion has been aggravated by the simplistic assumption that equates collectivism with the social identity processes that lead to undesirable consequences in intergroup settings. Drawing on the previous work that examined how Ind‐Col relates to intergroup bias at multiple levels, this review challenges the widely held expectation that collectivism is a conduit to various forms of intergroup bias and calls for research that takes into account the diverse viewpoints about the nature of group processes and intergroup behavior across cultures

Asian Journal Of Social PsychologyVol. 28(2)
Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Sungkyunkwan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cultural Differences and Values
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.