Reflections on preparing regional chapters for NCA5

Regional chapters in the National Climate Assessment (NCA) report provide a comprehensive synthesis of how climate change is impacting United States regions and are extensively used to support climate change decision-making by local communities and policymakers. The regional chapter author teams are tasked with assessing the climate trends, risks, and responses across a range of sectors and across a vast and diverse geography, while making content locally relevant. Regional chapters have evolved in many ways since the third NCA (NCA3), often shifting from focusing on climate stressors and hazards to addressing more diverse human-centric impacts (e.g., human health), inequities, and other barriers to action. The fifth NCA (NCA5) author teams were constructed to be intentionally diverse, including more social scientists and cultural practitioners. Here, regional chapter authors provide reflections on the assessment process and identify some best practices for developing an effective regional chapter. These include building a diverse and complementary author team, utilizing technical contributors to enhance the technical and geographical expertise of the team, and conducting extensive public engagement with local communities and policymakers throughout the process. To improve future regional NCA chapters, we identify several recommendations: (1) thoughtful analysis and possible revision of regional boundaries, (2) inclusion of authors from underrepresented regions on national-scale topic chapters, (3) structured cross-chapter engagement among regional chapters, (4) a holistic communications plan for the post-release period, and (5) better coordination with sub-national climate assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climatic Change
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03874-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections on preparing regional chapters for NCA5

Allyza Lustig, Kimberly M. Wood, Michael Chang, Henry P. Huntington et al.
3 citations
Climatic Change
Climate Change Communication and Perception
12.60
article

Reflections on preparing regional chapters for NCA5

Allyza Lustig, Kimberly M. Wood, Michael Chang, Henry P. Huntington, V. W. Keener, Dave D. White, Emile Elias, Renee A. McPherson, Ellen L. Mecray, Patricia Chardón-Maldonado, Kathie Dello, Zena Grecni, Abby G. Frazier
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Regional chapters in the National Climate Assessment (NCA) report provide a comprehensive synthesis of how climate change is impacting United States regions and are extensively used to support climate change decision-making by local communities and policymakers. The regional chapter author teams are tasked with assessing the climate trends, risks, and responses across a range of sectors and across a vast and diverse geography, while making content locally relevant. Regional chapters have evolved in many ways since the third NCA (NCA3), often shifting from focusing on climate stressors and hazards to addressing more diverse human-centric impacts (e.g., human health), inequities, and other barriers to action. The fifth NCA (NCA5) author teams were constructed to be intentionally diverse, including more social scientists and cultural practitioners. Here, regional chapter authors provide reflections on the assessment process and identify some best practices for developing an effective regional chapter. These include building a diverse and complementary author team, utilizing technical contributors to enhance the technical and geographical expertise of the team, and conducting extensive public engagement with local communities and policymakers throughout the process. To improve future regional NCA chapters, we identify several recommendations: (1) thoughtful analysis and possible revision of regional boundaries, (2) inclusion of authors from underrepresented regions on national-scale topic chapters, (3) structured cross-chapter engagement among regional chapters, (4) a holistic communications plan for the post-release period, and (5) better coordination with sub-national climate assessments.

Climatic ChangeVol. 178(4)
Clark University (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Arizona (US), Ocean Conservancy (US), University of the Autonomous Regions of the Nicaraguan Caribbean Coast (NI), East–West Center (US), Southwest Watershed Research Center (US), Cascadia Research Collective (US), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (US), Arizona State University (US), ICF International (United States) (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.