Tunnel safety evaluation in the Nepal Himalaya: a case study of utilising analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for comprehensive risk assessment

Major development and infrastructure projects get a substantial amount of finance and cash each year in Nepal. Tunnelling constitutes one of a prosperous nation’s key infrastructures. One of the most difficult issues for project managers is to recognise and evaluate risks to project completion. Risks may be identified and evaluated using appropriate tools and techniques throughout project design, construction, and supervision. The tunnel construction activities are booming in recent years in Nepal; however, proper risk analysis is still lacking. Therefore, this study has implemented the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to deter- mine the risk. The most important risk area is Geo-technical (26.04%) followed by natural hazards (15.44%) and safety-related risk (15.13%). This is mainly due to tunnel squeezing, rock mass collapse, water inrush, portal collapse and natural hazards such as landslide, fire and earthquake. The safety-related issues are worker’s safety as tunnelling consists of confined space, harmful gases from blasting, and hit by heavy equipment. This research will be important for the better planning and construction of different types of tunnels in Nepal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Civil Engineering
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-025-00221-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tunnel safety evaluation in the Nepal Himalaya: a case study of utilising analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for comprehensive risk assessment

Basanta Raj Adhikari, Aagat Pyakurel
2 citations
Discover Civil Engineering
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
article

Tunnel safety evaluation in the Nepal Himalaya: a case study of utilising analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for comprehensive risk assessment

Basanta Raj Adhikari, Aagat Pyakurel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Major development and infrastructure projects get a substantial amount of finance and cash each year in Nepal. Tunnelling constitutes one of a prosperous nation’s key infrastructures. One of the most difficult issues for project managers is to recognise and evaluate risks to project completion. Risks may be identified and evaluated using appropriate tools and techniques throughout project design, construction, and supervision. The tunnel construction activities are booming in recent years in Nepal; however, proper risk analysis is still lacking. Therefore, this study has implemented the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to deter- mine the risk. The most important risk area is Geo-technical (26.04%) followed by natural hazards (15.44%) and safety-related risk (15.13%). This is mainly due to tunnel squeezing, rock mass collapse, water inrush, portal collapse and natural hazards such as landslide, fire and earthquake. The safety-related issues are worker’s safety as tunnelling consists of confined space, harmful gases from blasting, and hit by heavy equipment. This research will be important for the better planning and construction of different types of tunnels in Nepal.

Discover Civil EngineeringVol. 2(1)
Nepal Development Research Institute (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.