Harnessing model-based group decision support systems for more effective stakeholder engagement: Reflections from the field

Stakeholder engagement is an integral component of active and participatory decision-making, enabling robust outcomes to be delivered and facilitating organisations in gaining and retaining a social license to operate. However, engaging stakeholders requires methods that realise these benefits whilst avoiding common pitfalls such as tokenism, selective participation, and stakeholder fatigue amongst others. This paper reports on an approach to identify stakeholder perspectives on the socio-economic values associated with decommissioning of Australian offshore oil and gas structures in a manner that enabled a holistic understanding of these values. This involved combining causal mapping with group decision support system technology, allowing a complex range of views to be explored whilst reducing pressures for conformity. The results demonstrate how such a method can ensure transparency and facilitate knowledge sharing between stakeholders, whilst also underlining the significance of a systemic approach to understanding the heterogeneity of stakeholder views. These process outcomes provide policy-makers with insights into the complexities of perceived issues and opportunities associated with offshore decommissioning and an approach that enables a nuanced understanding of these and related grand challenges to be incorporated into marine policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean & Coastal Management
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107658
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harnessing model-based group decision support systems for more effective stakeholder engagement: Reflections from the field

Michael P. Burton, Fran Ackermann, Georgie Hill, Carmen E. Elrick‐Barr et al.
2 citations
Ocean & Coastal Management
Complex Systems and Decision Making
4.21
article

Harnessing model-based group decision support systems for more effective stakeholder engagement: Reflections from the field

Michael P. Burton, Fran Ackermann, Georgie Hill, Carmen E. Elrick‐Barr, Euan Sinclair Harvey, Johanna S. Zimmerhackel, Julian Clifton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is an integral component of active and participatory decision-making, enabling robust outcomes to be delivered and facilitating organisations in gaining and retaining a social license to operate. However, engaging stakeholders requires methods that realise these benefits whilst avoiding common pitfalls such as tokenism, selective participation, and stakeholder fatigue amongst others. This paper reports on an approach to identify stakeholder perspectives on the socio-economic values associated with decommissioning of Australian offshore oil and gas structures in a manner that enabled a holistic understanding of these values. This involved combining causal mapping with group decision support system technology, allowing a complex range of views to be explored whilst reducing pressures for conformity. The results demonstrate how such a method can ensure transparency and facilitate knowledge sharing between stakeholders, whilst also underlining the significance of a systemic approach to understanding the heterogeneity of stakeholder views. These process outcomes provide policy-makers with insights into the complexities of perceived issues and opportunities associated with offshore decommissioning and an approach that enables a nuanced understanding of these and related grand challenges to be incorporated into marine policy.

Ocean & Coastal ManagementVol. 267
University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.