A Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Sensor Fusion Schemes for Visual-Inertial Navigation

Visualinertial odometry (VIO) has been extensively studied for navigation in GNSS-denied environments, but its performance can be heavily impacted by the complexity of the navigation environments such as weather conditions, illumination variation, flight dynamics, and environmental structure. Hybrid fusion approaches integrating neural networks (NNs), especially gated recurrent units (GRUs) with the Kalman filters (KFs), such as error-state KF (ESKF) have shown promising results mitigating system nonlinearities due to challenging environmental conditions data issues, there is a lack of systematic studies quantitively analyzing and comparing performance differences unhand. To address this gap and enable robust navigation in complex conditions, this study proposes and systematically analyses the performance of three hybrid fusion schemes for VIO-based navigation of autonomous aerial vehicles (AAVs). These three hybrid VIO schemes include visual odometry (VO) error compensation using NN, KF error compensation using NN, and prediction of Kalman gain using NN. The comparative analysis is performed using data generated in MATLAB incorporating the unreal engine involving diverse challenging environmental conditions: fog, rain, illumination level variability, and variability in the number of features available for extraction during the AAV flight in the urban environment. The results demonstrate the performance improvement achieved by hybrid VIO fusion schemes compared to ESKF-based traditional fusion methods in the presence of multiple visual failure modes. Comparative analysis reveals notable improvement achieved by method 1 with enhancements of 93% in sunny, 91% in foggy, and 90% in rainy conditions than the other two hybrid VIO architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3555758
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Sensor Fusion Schemes for Visual-Inertial Navigation

Ivan Petrunin, Tarafder Elmi Tabassum, Zeeshan A. Rana
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
9.99
article

A Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Sensor Fusion Schemes for Visual-Inertial Navigation

Ivan Petrunin, Tarafder Elmi Tabassum, Zeeshan A. Rana
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Visualinertial odometry (VIO) has been extensively studied for navigation in GNSS-denied environments, but its performance can be heavily impacted by the complexity of the navigation environments such as weather conditions, illumination variation, flight dynamics, and environmental structure. Hybrid fusion approaches integrating neural networks (NNs), especially gated recurrent units (GRUs) with the Kalman filters (KFs), such as error-state KF (ESKF) have shown promising results mitigating system nonlinearities due to challenging environmental conditions data issues, there is a lack of systematic studies quantitively analyzing and comparing performance differences unhand. To address this gap and enable robust navigation in complex conditions, this study proposes and systematically analyses the performance of three hybrid fusion schemes for VIO-based navigation of autonomous aerial vehicles (AAVs). These three hybrid VIO schemes include visual odometry (VO) error compensation using NN, KF error compensation using NN, and prediction of Kalman gain using NN. The comparative analysis is performed using data generated in MATLAB incorporating the unreal engine involving diverse challenging environmental conditions: fog, rain, illumination level variability, and variability in the number of features available for extraction during the AAV flight in the urban environment. The results demonstrate the performance improvement achieved by hybrid VIO fusion schemes compared to ESKF-based traditional fusion methods in the presence of multiple visual failure modes. Comparative analysis reveals notable improvement achieved by method 1 with enhancements of 93% in sunny, 91% in foggy, and 90% in rainy conditions than the other two hybrid VIO architectures.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
Cranfield University (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Sensor Fusion Schemes for Visual-Inertial Navigation — Ivan Petrunin, Tarafder Elmi Tabassum, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS