The Life of the Productive Imagination in Ricoeur’s Philosophy of the Imagination

Abstract This essay explores the historical, ontological and practical dimensions of the life of the productive imagination in Ricoeur’s philosophy of the imagination. First of all, I will attempt to clarify what the historicity belonging to the dialectic of innovation and sedimentation governing Ricoeur’s thesis of threefold mimesis adds to his important revision of the Kantian conception of the transcendental. I will propose characterizing the complex status of the productive schematism of metaphor and narrative as theorized by Ricoeur as a “transhistorical quasi-transcendantal.” Then I shall consider more closely the ontological and phenomenological dimensions of the process of threefold mimesis, asking what is the core experience that underlies this process. As I will attempt to show, it is the lived experience of a productive tension between invention and discovery that allows Ricoeur to think of the productive imagination as an incarnate imagination, one that deals with the world and with history. This experience, I want to suggest, implies a conception of the productive power of the imagination as an operative virtuality already manifest at the level of prefiguration that makes thinkable the paradoxical unfolding of an “ontology of fiction”.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Imaginaries
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/27727866-bja00054
Primary Topic
Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Life of the Productive Imagination in Ricoeur’s Philosophy of the Imagination

Jean-Luc Amalric, David Pellauer
International Journal of Social Imaginaries
Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
article

The Life of the Productive Imagination in Ricoeur’s Philosophy of the Imagination

Jean-Luc Amalric, David Pellauer
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay explores the historical, ontological and practical dimensions of the life of the productive imagination in Ricoeur’s philosophy of the imagination. First of all, I will attempt to clarify what the historicity belonging to the dialectic of innovation and sedimentation governing Ricoeur’s thesis of threefold mimesis adds to his important revision of the Kantian conception of the transcendental. I will propose characterizing the complex status of the productive schematism of metaphor and narrative as theorized by Ricoeur as a “transhistorical quasi-transcendantal.” Then I shall consider more closely the ontological and phenomenological dimensions of the process of threefold mimesis, asking what is the core experience that underlies this process. As I will attempt to show, it is the lived experience of a productive tension between invention and discovery that allows Ricoeur to think of the productive imagination as an incarnate imagination, one that deals with the world and with history. This experience, I want to suggest, implies a conception of the productive power of the imagination as an operative virtuality already manifest at the level of prefiguration that makes thinkable the paradoxical unfolding of an “ontology of fiction”.

International Journal of Social ImaginariesVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.