Enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model for solid–fluid phase transition of granular media

Accurately describing the solid-like and fluid-like behaviors of granular media is crucial in geotechnical engineering. While the unified frictional-collisional model, integrating rate-independent frictional and rate-dependent collisional stresses, is widely used for solid–fluid phase transitions, an effective model is still under investigation, and comprehensive analyses are lacking. This study addresses these gaps by developing an enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model. The frictional stress is modeled using a critical-state-based elastoplasticity approach, and the collisional stress is formulated through an enhanced kinetic theory incorporating particle stiffness. Subsequently, comprehensive element simulations are conducted to explore the effects of concentration, particle stiffness, and strain rate paths on the model. The proposed model’s effectiveness is also validated against experimental data. Finally, a detailed comparison with the typical μ (I) rheology model and a state-equation-based phase transition model is conducted. Our analyses show that the developed model effectively captures strain rate path and particle stiffness through the collisional stress component, while concentration-dependent characteristics are captured through both frictional and collisional stress components. Through comparative analyses, we also found that both the state-equation-based and elastoplasticity-based models depict solid-like behavior and replicate the rheology of granular media in a fluid-like state, similar to the μ (I) model. However, they differ in implementing critical state theory: the state-equation-based model acts as a partial-range phase transition model, describing stress evolution from the critical state to the fluid-like state, while the proposed elastoplasticity-based model serves as a full-range phase transition model, covering stress evolution from the initial to the fluid-like state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Geotechnics
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107218
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model for solid–fluid phase transition of granular media

Zhen‐Yu Yin, Hang Feng
5 citations
Computers and Geotechnics
Granular flow and fluidized beds
6.67
article

Enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model for solid–fluid phase transition of granular media

Zhen‐Yu Yin, Hang Feng
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Accurately describing the solid-like and fluid-like behaviors of granular media is crucial in geotechnical engineering. While the unified frictional-collisional model, integrating rate-independent frictional and rate-dependent collisional stresses, is widely used for solid–fluid phase transitions, an effective model is still under investigation, and comprehensive analyses are lacking. This study addresses these gaps by developing an enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model. The frictional stress is modeled using a critical-state-based elastoplasticity approach, and the collisional stress is formulated through an enhanced kinetic theory incorporating particle stiffness. Subsequently, comprehensive element simulations are conducted to explore the effects of concentration, particle stiffness, and strain rate paths on the model. The proposed model’s effectiveness is also validated against experimental data. Finally, a detailed comparison with the typical μ (I) rheology model and a state-equation-based phase transition model is conducted. Our analyses show that the developed model effectively captures strain rate path and particle stiffness through the collisional stress component, while concentration-dependent characteristics are captured through both frictional and collisional stress components. Through comparative analyses, we also found that both the state-equation-based and elastoplasticity-based models depict solid-like behavior and replicate the rheology of granular media in a fluid-like state, similar to the μ (I) model. However, they differ in implementing critical state theory: the state-equation-based model acts as a partial-range phase transition model, describing stress evolution from the critical state to the fluid-like state, while the proposed elastoplasticity-based model serves as a full-range phase transition model, covering stress evolution from the initial to the fluid-like state.

Computers and GeotechnicsVol. 183
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
6.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.