Diagnostic Errors for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder from the Specialists' Point of View

The study aimed to discern diagnostic errors and their correlation with therapeutic interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of specialists. This was examined in relation to variables such as gender, educational qualifications, years of experience, and specialization. To achieve this, the researcher employed a descriptive correlational approach, collecting quantitative data. The study instruments, encompassing diagnostic errors and therapeutic interventions, were applied to the entire specialist community in special education centers in the Ramallah and Al-Bireh governorate, totaling (255) specialists. A questionnaire consisting of thirty paragraphs was utilized and their reliability and stability were ensured. The results revealed that the overall mean for the total average of the Diagnostic Errors scale, as perceived by specialists for individuals with an autism spectrum disorder, was (3.78) with a high estimation. The mean scores on the Diagnostic Errors scale for individuals with autism spectrum disorder ranged from (1.50-4.40). The results indicated a lack of statistically significant differences at a significance level (α ≥ 0.05) among the means of the assessments of the study sample regarding the reality of Diagnostic Errors for individuals with autism spectrum disorder, as perceived by specialists. These variations were attributed to variables such as gender, educational qualifications, and specialization. However, differences emerged concerning the variable of years of experience, favoring specialists with 10 years or more of experience. In light of the study results, the researcher recommends a concerted focus on the assessment and diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder through the training of specialists in methods of measuring and diagnosing these conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Scientific Research
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59992/ijsr.2025.v4n3p9
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Errors for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder from the Specialists' Point of View

AA Zayed, Tamer Suhail
1 links
International Journal for Scientific Research
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Diagnostic Errors for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder from the Specialists' Point of View

AA Zayed, Tamer Suhail
article en

Abstract

The study aimed to discern diagnostic errors and their correlation with therapeutic interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of specialists. This was examined in relation to variables such as gender, educational qualifications, years of experience, and specialization. To achieve this, the researcher employed a descriptive correlational approach, collecting quantitative data. The study instruments, encompassing diagnostic errors and therapeutic interventions, were applied to the entire specialist community in special education centers in the Ramallah and Al-Bireh governorate, totaling (255) specialists. A questionnaire consisting of thirty paragraphs was utilized and their reliability and stability were ensured. The results revealed that the overall mean for the total average of the Diagnostic Errors scale, as perceived by specialists for individuals with an autism spectrum disorder, was (3.78) with a high estimation. The mean scores on the Diagnostic Errors scale for individuals with autism spectrum disorder ranged from (1.50-4.40). The results indicated a lack of statistically significant differences at a significance level (α ≥ 0.05) among the means of the assessments of the study sample regarding the reality of Diagnostic Errors for individuals with autism spectrum disorder, as perceived by specialists. These variations were attributed to variables such as gender, educational qualifications, and specialization. However, differences emerged concerning the variable of years of experience, favoring specialists with 10 years or more of experience. In light of the study results, the researcher recommends a concerted focus on the assessment and diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder through the training of specialists in methods of measuring and diagnosing these conditions.

International Journal for Scientific ResearchVol. 4(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnostic Errors for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder from the Specialists' Point of View — AA Zayed, Tamer Suhail · International Journal for Scientific Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS