Development of a self-administered metacognitive coping strategies scale for metacognitive training: an exploratory study examining the relationship between coping awareness and psychopathology

Abstract This study developed a self-administered metacognitive coping strategy scale that reflects metacognition changes resulting from metacognitive training. A 25-item scale with four subscales was developed based on data obtained from 286 adults in the general population in Japan. The statistical reliability of the scale, including the retest reliability, ranged from moderate to high. Correlations with other scales supported the developed scale’s expected validity. A survey was also conducted among 20 people with schizophrenia. The scores on this scale were positively correlated with adaptive coping and beliefs, and negatively correlated with delusions, and there was no significant correlation with anxiety or depression. This evidence suggested some of the clinical validity. Additionally, in terms of the cognitive behavioral therapy aspect of metacognitive training, the metacognitive coping strategy scale would be a useful tool for participants of metacognitive training and trainers in practice. In the future, it will be necessary to investigate a larger clinical sample to confirm clinical validity, and to confirm the usefulness in clinical practice by tracking changes over time through metacognitive training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07691-5
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a self-administered metacognitive coping strategies scale for metacognitive training: an exploratory study examining the relationship between coping awareness and psychopathology

Takuma Ishigaki, Yuki Nishiguchi, Takeshi Shimada
Current Psychology
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

Development of a self-administered metacognitive coping strategies scale for metacognitive training: an exploratory study examining the relationship between coping awareness and psychopathology

Takuma Ishigaki, Yuki Nishiguchi, Takeshi Shimada
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study developed a self-administered metacognitive coping strategy scale that reflects metacognition changes resulting from metacognitive training. A 25-item scale with four subscales was developed based on data obtained from 286 adults in the general population in Japan. The statistical reliability of the scale, including the retest reliability, ranged from moderate to high. Correlations with other scales supported the developed scale’s expected validity. A survey was also conducted among 20 people with schizophrenia. The scores on this scale were positively correlated with adaptive coping and beliefs, and negatively correlated with delusions, and there was no significant correlation with anxiety or depression. This evidence suggested some of the clinical validity. Additionally, in terms of the cognitive behavioral therapy aspect of metacognitive training, the metacognitive coping strategy scale would be a useful tool for participants of metacognitive training and trainers in practice. In the future, it will be necessary to investigate a larger clinical sample to confirm clinical validity, and to confirm the usefulness in clinical practice by tracking changes over time through metacognitive training.

Current PsychologyVol. 44(8)
Chiba University (JP), Tokyo University of the Arts (JP), National Sanyo Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.