Switching Off: Energy Saving Goals Outshine Incentives—Evidence from a Field Experiment

Abstract Feedback interventions are a promising tool for promoting household energy conservation and addressing climate change. This study examines whether their effectiveness improves with incentivized energy saving goals through a field experiment involving 422 Singaporean households over eight months. All treatment groups received tailored feedback reports, energy saving goals, and tips. Two groups also received additional incentives: monetary rewards or environmental donations. Households receiving only feedback, goals and savings tips reduced electricity use by 16% compared to the control group, but those offered additional monetary or environmental incentives achieved no further savings. Notabl the effects persisted marginally post-intervention in the goal treatment. These results indicate that low-cost behavioral strategies like feedback, savings tips and goal setting can be as effective as costly incentives, providing a scalable and economical pathway for energy conservation initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-00973-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Switching Off: Energy Saving Goals Outshine Incentives—Evidence from a Field Experiment

Kathrin Schmitt, Verena Tiefenbeck, Natalia Borzino, Renate Schubert et al.
4 citations
Environmental and Resource Economics
Environmental Education and Sustainability
9.69
article

Switching Off: Energy Saving Goals Outshine Incentives—Evidence from a Field Experiment

Kathrin Schmitt, Verena Tiefenbeck, Natalia Borzino, Renate Schubert, Jan Schmitz, Benjamin Hiepler
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Feedback interventions are a promising tool for promoting household energy conservation and addressing climate change. This study examines whether their effectiveness improves with incentivized energy saving goals through a field experiment involving 422 Singaporean households over eight months. All treatment groups received tailored feedback reports, energy saving goals, and tips. Two groups also received additional incentives: monetary rewards or environmental donations. Households receiving only feedback, goals and savings tips reduced electricity use by 16% compared to the control group, but those offered additional monetary or environmental incentives achieved no further savings. Notabl the effects persisted marginally post-intervention in the goal treatment. These results indicate that low-cost behavioral strategies like feedback, savings tips and goal setting can be as effective as costly incentives, providing a scalable and economical pathway for energy conservation initiatives.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 88(6)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
9.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Switching Off: Energy Saving Goals Outshine Incentives—Evidence from a Field Experiment — Kathrin Schmitt, Verena Tiefenbeck, et al. · Environmental and Resource Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS