An Empirical Study on the Integrated Model of Followership and Leadership Styles in Japan

This study explores an integrated model of followership and leadership styles that functions optimally. Utilizing Kelley’s (1992) model of followership and Hersey and Blanchard’s (1982) situational leadership theory, Bjugstad et al. (2006) proposed a theoretical framework linking these constructs. However, empirical exploration remains limited in the literature. The analysis focused on variables, such as demographic factors, affective commitment, followership, and leadership. Affective commitment was measured as a reflection of follower productivity, given its known impact on job performance. All proposed hypotheses were rejected, indicating that exemplary and conformist followership styles are associated with higher productivity, independent of leadership styles. Active followership enhances affective commitment among followers. Post-hoc analyses revealed that followership (active) and leadership (task behavior) positively influence affective commitment, while their combination with leadership (relationship behavior) yields negative effects. These findings highlight the complex dynamics between followership and leadership in promoting affective commitment within organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.133763
Primary Topic
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Empirical Study on the Integrated Model of Followership and Leadership Styles in Japan

Minoru Nishinobo
Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
article

An Empirical Study on the Integrated Model of Followership and Leadership Styles in Japan

Minoru Nishinobo
article en

Abstract

This study explores an integrated model of followership and leadership styles that functions optimally. Utilizing Kelley’s (1992) model of followership and Hersey and Blanchard’s (1982) situational leadership theory, Bjugstad et al. (2006) proposed a theoretical framework linking these constructs. However, empirical exploration remains limited in the literature. The analysis focused on variables, such as demographic factors, affective commitment, followership, and leadership. Affective commitment was measured as a reflection of follower productivity, given its known impact on job performance. All proposed hypotheses were rejected, indicating that exemplary and conformist followership styles are associated with higher productivity, independent of leadership styles. Active followership enhances affective commitment among followers. Post-hoc analyses revealed that followership (active) and leadership (task behavior) positively influence affective commitment, while their combination with leadership (relationship behavior) yields negative effects. These findings highlight the complex dynamics between followership and leadership in promoting affective commitment within organizations.

Journal of Behavioral and Applied ManagementVol. 25(1)
Setsunan University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.