Public attitudes towards gasification technologies in the UK, Germany and China and their susceptibility to the Nasty Effect

In many countries, there is growing interest in the use of gasification technologies as an alternative to oil and natural gas in industrial-scale chemical production. Gasification could help to reduce reliance on fossil fuel imports and, depending upon the feedstock used, could help to decarbonise and improve the circularity of the sector. Despite the importance that public acceptance can have for the roll-out of industrial technologies, studies into public attitudes and risk perceptions of gasification technology are lacking. To address this gap, the current study investigated public attitudes towards two forms of gasification (coal and waste gasification) using an online survey distributed to demographically representative samples of the public from the UK, Germany and China. The objectives were to: (1) gain insight into public attitudes towards the use of gasification technologies in these countries; (2) assess potential divergence in public attitudes towards the use of different carbon sources within gasification; and (3) identify the potential impact of negative social framing – namely the Nasty Effect – on risk perceptions. Results showed that attitudes towards gasification were generally positive in all three countries, although significantly more so in China. The anticipated preference for waste gasification was observed in the UK and Germany but not in China. There was little consistent evidence of the Nasty Effect in terms of participants’ evaluations of the technological and environmental risks of gasification in each country. The results hold potential implications for the development of future outreach and communication activities relating to the technology. • Online survey to assess public attitudes towards coal and waste gasification in three countries. • Examination of the impact of public (in-)civility on risk perceptions (i.e. the Nasty Effect). • Positive attitudes in all countries with a preference for waste gasification in UK and Germany. • Evidence that public dissent increases risk perceptions but limited evidence of the Nasty Effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public attitudes towards gasification technologies in the UK, Germany and China and their susceptibility to the Nasty Effect

Daphne Kaklamanou, Roh Pin Lee, Christopher R. Jones
1 citations
Technology in Society
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
4.20
article

Public attitudes towards gasification technologies in the UK, Germany and China and their susceptibility to the Nasty Effect

Daphne Kaklamanou, Roh Pin Lee, Christopher R. Jones
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In many countries, there is growing interest in the use of gasification technologies as an alternative to oil and natural gas in industrial-scale chemical production. Gasification could help to reduce reliance on fossil fuel imports and, depending upon the feedstock used, could help to decarbonise and improve the circularity of the sector. Despite the importance that public acceptance can have for the roll-out of industrial technologies, studies into public attitudes and risk perceptions of gasification technology are lacking. To address this gap, the current study investigated public attitudes towards two forms of gasification (coal and waste gasification) using an online survey distributed to demographically representative samples of the public from the UK, Germany and China. The objectives were to: (1) gain insight into public attitudes towards the use of gasification technologies in these countries; (2) assess potential divergence in public attitudes towards the use of different carbon sources within gasification; and (3) identify the potential impact of negative social framing – namely the Nasty Effect – on risk perceptions. Results showed that attitudes towards gasification were generally positive in all three countries, although significantly more so in China. The anticipated preference for waste gasification was observed in the UK and Germany but not in China. There was little consistent evidence of the Nasty Effect in terms of participants’ evaluations of the technological and environmental risks of gasification in each country. The results hold potential implications for the development of future outreach and communication activities relating to the technology. • Online survey to assess public attitudes towards coal and waste gasification in three countries. • Examination of the impact of public (in-)civility on risk perceptions (i.e. the Nasty Effect). • Positive attitudes in all countries with a preference for waste gasification in UK and Germany. • Evidence that public dissent increases risk perceptions but limited evidence of the Nasty Effect.

Technology in SocietyVol. 82
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (DE), University of Portsmouth (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.