When the Palestinian refugee camp became a “squatter settlement”

Abstract Palestinian refugees in Amman persistently call what is now a densely built urban environment, a camp (mukhayyam). Officially, however, the camp went from being recognized by Jordanian host authorities to becoming a “squatter settlement” in World Bank projects, all the while remaining non-recognized by the UN body responsible for Palestine refugees. This article uncovers how sustained humanitarian non-recognition ushered in a language of “informality” that justified demolition and displacement as vehicle for development. In locating this lexical shift in the 1980s and 1990s, this article exposes a new form of epistemic and spatial dispossession brought upon the Palestinians. In calling into question acts of classification, this article historicizes how and why the refugee camp component of the question of Palestine became submerged under “informality.” At the same time, attuned to a Palestinian spatial vocabulary and grammar, this article reveals how the mukhayyam remained resistant to the forces that did not recognize its legitimacy and those that sought to informalize it. It is in this sense that the camp, as a broader encompassing Palestinian vocabulary, has a radical currency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refugee Studies
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaf022
Primary Topic
Middle East Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the Palestinian refugee camp became a “squatter settlement”

Heba Alnajada
1 links
Journal of Refugee Studies
Middle East Politics and Society
article

When the Palestinian refugee camp became a “squatter settlement”

Heba Alnajada
article en

Abstract

Abstract Palestinian refugees in Amman persistently call what is now a densely built urban environment, a camp (mukhayyam). Officially, however, the camp went from being recognized by Jordanian host authorities to becoming a “squatter settlement” in World Bank projects, all the while remaining non-recognized by the UN body responsible for Palestine refugees. This article uncovers how sustained humanitarian non-recognition ushered in a language of “informality” that justified demolition and displacement as vehicle for development. In locating this lexical shift in the 1980s and 1990s, this article exposes a new form of epistemic and spatial dispossession brought upon the Palestinians. In calling into question acts of classification, this article historicizes how and why the refugee camp component of the question of Palestine became submerged under “informality.” At the same time, attuned to a Palestinian spatial vocabulary and grammar, this article reveals how the mukhayyam remained resistant to the forces that did not recognize its legitimacy and those that sought to informalize it. It is in this sense that the camp, as a broader encompassing Palestinian vocabulary, has a radical currency.

Journal of Refugee Studies
Boston University (US)
University of California
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Middle East Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.