Low-thrust under-actuated satellite formation guidance and control strategies

This study presents autonomous guidance and control strategies for reconfiguring close-range multi-satellite formations. The formation consists of N under-actuated deputy satellites and an uncontrolled virtual or physical chief spacecraft. Each deputy is equipped with a single throttleable but ungimbaled low-thrust nozzle, requiring a combination of thrust and coast arcs, during the latter attitude adjustments redirect the nozzle to the desired thrust direction. The guidance problem is formulated as a trajectory optimization task incorporating dynamical and physical constraints, along with a minimum acceleration threshold imposed by typical electric thrusters. Two frameworks are considered: centralized and distributed. The centralized approach ensures fuel-optimal solutions but is feasible only for small formations, with all calculations performed on a physical chief satellite. The distributed approach, while sub-optimal, scales better by treating the chief as a virtual point mass and allowing each deputy to handle its own computations. This study focuses on spaceborne closed-loop control implementation, ensuring reliability and automation in solving the optimal control problem. To mitigate infeasibility risks, constraints that pose potential threats are identified and softened. Two Model Predictive Control architectures, shrinking-horizon and fixed-horizon, are implemented and compared in terms of fuel consumption and control accuracy. Their performance is analyzed for typical close-range reconfigurations required in Earth observation missions and benchmarked against existing approaches in the literature. • Guidance and control schemes for N-satellite formation reconfiguration. • Under-actuated satellites using a single electric thruster. • Incorporates close-range collision avoidance constraints and a minimum thrust threshold. • Softens constraints that risk infeasibility, allowing controlled small violations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Astronautica
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.02.048
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-thrust under-actuated satellite formation guidance and control strategies

Ahmed Mahfouz, Gabriella Gaias, Holger Voos, Florio Dalla Vedova
2 citations
Acta Astronautica
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
9.99
article

Low-thrust under-actuated satellite formation guidance and control strategies

Ahmed Mahfouz, Gabriella Gaias, Holger Voos, Florio Dalla Vedova
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study presents autonomous guidance and control strategies for reconfiguring close-range multi-satellite formations. The formation consists of N under-actuated deputy satellites and an uncontrolled virtual or physical chief spacecraft. Each deputy is equipped with a single throttleable but ungimbaled low-thrust nozzle, requiring a combination of thrust and coast arcs, during the latter attitude adjustments redirect the nozzle to the desired thrust direction. The guidance problem is formulated as a trajectory optimization task incorporating dynamical and physical constraints, along with a minimum acceleration threshold imposed by typical electric thrusters. Two frameworks are considered: centralized and distributed. The centralized approach ensures fuel-optimal solutions but is feasible only for small formations, with all calculations performed on a physical chief satellite. The distributed approach, while sub-optimal, scales better by treating the chief as a virtual point mass and allowing each deputy to handle its own computations. This study focuses on spaceborne closed-loop control implementation, ensuring reliability and automation in solving the optimal control problem. To mitigate infeasibility risks, constraints that pose potential threats are identified and softened. Two Model Predictive Control architectures, shrinking-horizon and fixed-horizon, are implemented and compared in terms of fuel consumption and control accuracy. Their performance is analyzed for typical close-range reconfigurations required in Earth observation missions and benchmarked against existing approaches in the literature. • Guidance and control schemes for N-satellite formation reconfiguration. • Under-actuated satellites using a single electric thruster. • Incorporates close-range collision avoidance constraints and a minimum thrust threshold. • Softens constraints that risk infeasibility, allowing controlled small violations.

Acta AstronauticaVol. 232
University of Luxembourg (LU), SES (Luxembourg) (LU), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.