Disentangling Integration of Psychology and Theology: A Decolonial Critique and Improvisation in Spiritual Care and Counseling

This article critiques the traditional model of integrating psychology and theology, highlighting its colonial underpinnings. While the integration of these fields has yielded beneficial outcomes, it often centers the perspectives of white, male Christians and neglects diverse, marginalized voices. Theology is often reduced to providing resources for psychological insight without interrogating the psychological frameworks themselves. This article proposes a decolonial alternative, advocating for an epistemic shift that challenges the hegemony of Western-centered ideologies. This shift would embrace hybridity, cultural distinctiveness, collectivism, and liberation theology. The authors also examine the Netflix series Beef as a case study, using it to illustrate how colonial forces shape the psychological and spiritual struggles of marginalized groups. The article concludes by sketching a roadmap for counselors to adopt a decolonial approach, emphasizing embodied, community-based healing practices and the reclamation of indigenous spiritual wisdom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychology and Theology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00916471251327921
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling Integration of Psychology and Theology: A Decolonial Critique and Improvisation in Spiritual Care and Counseling

Rolf Nolasco, Hamin Kwak
Journal of Psychology and Theology
African cultural and philosophical studies
article

Disentangling Integration of Psychology and Theology: A Decolonial Critique and Improvisation in Spiritual Care and Counseling

Rolf Nolasco, Hamin Kwak
article en

Abstract

This article critiques the traditional model of integrating psychology and theology, highlighting its colonial underpinnings. While the integration of these fields has yielded beneficial outcomes, it often centers the perspectives of white, male Christians and neglects diverse, marginalized voices. Theology is often reduced to providing resources for psychological insight without interrogating the psychological frameworks themselves. This article proposes a decolonial alternative, advocating for an epistemic shift that challenges the hegemony of Western-centered ideologies. This shift would embrace hybridity, cultural distinctiveness, collectivism, and liberation theology. The authors also examine the Netflix series Beef as a case study, using it to illustrate how colonial forces shape the psychological and spiritual struggles of marginalized groups. The article concludes by sketching a roadmap for counselors to adopt a decolonial approach, emphasizing embodied, community-based healing practices and the reclamation of indigenous spiritual wisdom.

Journal of Psychology and TheologyVol. 53(2)
Garrett–Evangelical Theological Seminary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
African cultural and philosophical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disentangling Integration of Psychology and Theology: A Decolonial Critique and Improvisation in Spiritual Care and Counseling — Rolf Nolasco, Hamin Kwak · Journal of Psychology and Theology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS