Environmental policies, environmental firms, and transboundary pollution

Abstract Using a general equilibrium model of symmetric countries, this paper analyzes a non-cooperative game in environmental policies under transboundary pollution. Emission taxes on polluting firms and subsidies to environmental firms are available policy instruments. Environmental firms which produce pollution abatement goods and services engage in imperfect competition. Mobile capital is employed in each country by polluting and environmental firms. Compared with the first-best policies, non-cooperative taxes are lower, whereas non-cooperative subsidies are higher. Although excessive subsidies mitigate the distortionary effect of inefficiently low emission taxes, the equilibrium level of pollution is inefficiently high due to overinvestment in polluting firms and underinvestment in environmental firms. This analytical result suggests that there are limitations to what non-cooperative tax and subsidy policies can achieve regarding transboundary pollution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-025-00444-5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental policies, environmental firms, and transboundary pollution

Mutsumi Matsumoto
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Environmental policies, environmental firms, and transboundary pollution

Mutsumi Matsumoto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using a general equilibrium model of symmetric countries, this paper analyzes a non-cooperative game in environmental policies under transboundary pollution. Emission taxes on polluting firms and subsidies to environmental firms are available policy instruments. Environmental firms which produce pollution abatement goods and services engage in imperfect competition. Mobile capital is employed in each country by polluting and environmental firms. Compared with the first-best policies, non-cooperative taxes are lower, whereas non-cooperative subsidies are higher. Although excessive subsidies mitigate the distortionary effect of inefficiently low emission taxes, the equilibrium level of pollution is inefficiently high due to overinvestment in polluting firms and underinvestment in environmental firms. This analytical result suggests that there are limitations to what non-cooperative tax and subsidy policies can achieve regarding transboundary pollution.

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Ritsumeikan University (JP), Nagoya University (JP)
Nagoya University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental policies, environmental firms, and transboundary pollution — Mutsumi Matsumoto · Environmental Economics and Policy Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS