Amazonian savannas are an integral part of Brazil’s Amazon “biome”: implications for environmental policies

Abstract Conservation policies in Brazil differ between the “biomes” into which the country has divided its territory since 2004. The Amazon biome is predominantly tropical forest but also includes unique savanna ecosystems, while the Cerrado biome is composed of various types of savanna but also includes islands and corridors of forest. Confusion, both inadvertent and deliberate, between the terms Cerrado and “savanna” has resulted in reducing the protection of Amazonian savannas by allowing less-demanding requirements applicable to the Cerrado biome to be applied. Threats to Amazonian savannas are also increased by legal provisions that allow required “legal reserves” in private properties to be compensated by reserves elsewhere in the same biome without requiring them to be of the same ecosystem type. We suggest needed clarifications and changes in Brazil’s regulations to guarantee the protection of the country’s unique Amazonian savanna ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Conservation
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-025-00031-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amazonian savannas are an integral part of Brazil’s Amazon “biome”: implications for environmental policies

Cláudia Regina da Silva, José Júlio de Toledo, Bruna da Silva Xavier, Hernani F. M. Oliveira et al.
2 citations
Discover Conservation
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
article

Amazonian savannas are an integral part of Brazil’s Amazon “biome”: implications for environmental policies

Cláudia Regina da Silva, José Júlio de Toledo, Bruna da Silva Xavier, Hernani F. M. Oliveira, William Douglas de Carvalho, Fernando César Paiva Dagosta, Philip M. Fearnside, Renato Richard Hilário, Karen Mustin, Salustiano Vilar da Costa Neto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Conservation policies in Brazil differ between the “biomes” into which the country has divided its territory since 2004. The Amazon biome is predominantly tropical forest but also includes unique savanna ecosystems, while the Cerrado biome is composed of various types of savanna but also includes islands and corridors of forest. Confusion, both inadvertent and deliberate, between the terms Cerrado and “savanna” has resulted in reducing the protection of Amazonian savannas by allowing less-demanding requirements applicable to the Cerrado biome to be applied. Threats to Amazonian savannas are also increased by legal provisions that allow required “legal reserves” in private properties to be compensated by reserves elsewhere in the same biome without requiring them to be of the same ecosystem type. We suggest needed clarifications and changes in Brazil’s regulations to guarantee the protection of the country’s unique Amazonian savanna ecosystems.

Discover ConservationVol. 2(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR), Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (BR), Universidade Federal do Amapá (BR), Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.