Knowledge of the horizon: a meta-analysis of evaluating mortality incidence in multiple modalities therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved with advances in targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgical interventions, each showing survival benefits. Although these approaches, used singly or in combination, improve outcomes, the optimal strategy remains to be determined. Yet, limited comparisons across strategies create a need to identify the most effective treatments for mRCC patients. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate combined surgical, targeted, and systemic therapies for mRCC, focusing on survival and mortality risk. Our aim was to offer insights that could guide future treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis for meta-analyses using dichotomous types. To analyse clinical studies reporting the use of combination therapy (surgery and systemic intervention) for evaluating mortality incidence in mRCC, a systematic search was performed using three electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). Ten years of studies, English full paper text, and original research retrospective study design were included. Statistical analyses using Review Manager Application 5.4.1 version. From 1019 studies, there are eleven studies were eligible in this meta-analysis and have a low risk of bias. Ten studies comprising 2644 patients were included in this study for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Ten studies report the use of Combination Therapy (surgery and systemic intervention) for evaluating mortality incidence in mRCC. Quantitative synthesis showed Combination intervention was associated with death incidence in metastatic events in renal cell carcinoma with odds ratio (OR) 1.46 (95% CI; 1.37-1,54; I2=98%, p value=<0,0001). Furthermore, this research is still found to be qualitatively controversial. Our review indicates that combination therapies for mRCC improve survival outcomes but entail complex mortality risks. Further research is needed to refine therapy combinations and patient selection, underscoring a personalized approach to balance benefits with risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250990
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge of the horizon: a meta-analysis of evaluating mortality incidence in multiple modalities therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Indra Wijaya, ⁠I Wayan Yudiana, Luh Putu Yuka Chandra Astina
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Knowledge of the horizon: a meta-analysis of evaluating mortality incidence in multiple modalities therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Indra Wijaya, ⁠I Wayan Yudiana, Luh Putu Yuka Chandra Astina
article en

Abstract

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved with advances in targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgical interventions, each showing survival benefits. Although these approaches, used singly or in combination, improve outcomes, the optimal strategy remains to be determined. Yet, limited comparisons across strategies create a need to identify the most effective treatments for mRCC patients. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate combined surgical, targeted, and systemic therapies for mRCC, focusing on survival and mortality risk. Our aim was to offer insights that could guide future treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis for meta-analyses using dichotomous types. To analyse clinical studies reporting the use of combination therapy (surgery and systemic intervention) for evaluating mortality incidence in mRCC, a systematic search was performed using three electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). Ten years of studies, English full paper text, and original research retrospective study design were included. Statistical analyses using Review Manager Application 5.4.1 version. From 1019 studies, there are eleven studies were eligible in this meta-analysis and have a low risk of bias. Ten studies comprising 2644 patients were included in this study for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Ten studies report the use of Combination Therapy (surgery and systemic intervention) for evaluating mortality incidence in mRCC. Quantitative synthesis showed Combination intervention was associated with death incidence in metastatic events in renal cell carcinoma with odds ratio (OR) 1.46 (95% CI; 1.37-1,54; I2=98%, p value=<0,0001). Furthermore, this research is still found to be qualitatively controversial. Our review indicates that combination therapies for mRCC improve survival outcomes but entail complex mortality risks. Further research is needed to refine therapy combinations and patient selection, underscoring a personalized approach to balance benefits with risks.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 13(4)
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (ID), Universitas Ngurah Rai (ID), Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Sanglah Denpasar (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.