Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients stratified by hormone receptor status: a tertiary care study

Background: Bone metastatic disease is common across all breast cancer subtypes. Patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer tend to have the greatest predilection for developing bone metastases and have better survival outcomes; unlike organotypic metastasis to visceral organs in triple-negative breast cancer. In this retrospective study, we compared the features and survival of these bone metastatic breast cancer subgroups and demonstrated that different ER and PR statuses contribute to varied survival outcomes. Methods: It was a single‑institute retro prospective study. Out of the 200 HPR-proven cases of breast carcinoma, 100 patients were eligible for the study who presented/developed bone metastases. Patients with visceral mets were excluded from the study. Based on ER, PR and HER2 neu, status patients were divided into four groups. Results: Out of 100 patients taken for this study 45 were ER+ PR+, 20 were Er-,PR-, 18 were ER-, PR +, and 17 were ER+,PR-.and the mean age in the study groups was 49.5±.5. Higher tumour grade and lymph node positivity was observed in ER- PR- and ER- PR+ as compared to hormone-positive groups. In our study group percentage of bone mets was higher in ER +, PR+(31.11 ) and ER+ PR- (52.63%),While as it was similar in Er-,PR- and ER-, PR + patients. The overall survival of ER+ PR- was 94.1% followed by ER +, PR+(86.7%) while patients with ER-, PR- had 30.0% and ER-, PR + 27.8%. Conclusions: Different ER and PR statuses in breast cancer exert a significant impact on bone metastasis incidence and survival condition of bone metastatic breast cancer. Hormone receptor‑positive tumours show a predilection for bones as the first site of relapse and better overall survival as compared to hormone‑receptor‑negative tumours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250979
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients stratified by hormone receptor status: a tertiary care study

Devraj, Dar Abdul Waheed, Shivwani D. Kotwal, Irfan Rasool Gadda
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Bone health and treatments
article

Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients stratified by hormone receptor status: a tertiary care study

Devraj, Dar Abdul Waheed, Shivwani D. Kotwal, Irfan Rasool Gadda
article en

Abstract

Background: Bone metastatic disease is common across all breast cancer subtypes. Patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer tend to have the greatest predilection for developing bone metastases and have better survival outcomes; unlike organotypic metastasis to visceral organs in triple-negative breast cancer. In this retrospective study, we compared the features and survival of these bone metastatic breast cancer subgroups and demonstrated that different ER and PR statuses contribute to varied survival outcomes. Methods: It was a single‑institute retro prospective study. Out of the 200 HPR-proven cases of breast carcinoma, 100 patients were eligible for the study who presented/developed bone metastases. Patients with visceral mets were excluded from the study. Based on ER, PR and HER2 neu, status patients were divided into four groups. Results: Out of 100 patients taken for this study 45 were ER+ PR+, 20 were Er-,PR-, 18 were ER-, PR +, and 17 were ER+,PR-.and the mean age in the study groups was 49.5±.5. Higher tumour grade and lymph node positivity was observed in ER- PR- and ER- PR+ as compared to hormone-positive groups. In our study group percentage of bone mets was higher in ER +, PR+(31.11 ) and ER+ PR- (52.63%),While as it was similar in Er-,PR- and ER-, PR + patients. The overall survival of ER+ PR- was 94.1% followed by ER +, PR+(86.7%) while patients with ER-, PR- had 30.0% and ER-, PR + 27.8%. Conclusions: Different ER and PR statuses in breast cancer exert a significant impact on bone metastasis incidence and survival condition of bone metastatic breast cancer. Hormone receptor‑positive tumours show a predilection for bones as the first site of relapse and better overall survival as compared to hormone‑receptor‑negative tumours.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 13(4)
Government Medical College (IN), Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients stratified by hormone receptor status: a tertiary care study — Devraj, Dar Abdul Waheed, et al. · International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS