Stress differences and their role in identifying earthquake source process properties at different tectonic environments

Abstract We investigated stress change parameters during ruptures for earthquakes globally with M w ≥ 6.0 from 1991 to 2023. Employing a formulation and alternative graphical method, we analyzed variations between initial and final stresses as compared to frictional stress during rupture. Our goal was to assess the validity of Orowan’s model (final stress equals frictional stress) across different environments, crucial for recurrent source studies. Our findings reveal significant deviations among event types: reverse-type events diverge slightly from Orowan’s model, while normal events show even larger discrepancy. Strike-slip events exhibit a blend of stress difference mechanisms, with around 30% displaying overshoot (final stress smaller than average frictional stress). The partial stress drop (final stress larger than average frictional stress) percentage for reverse and normal types indicates that approximately 21–23% of the available stress for rupture was not relieved. Our results suggest that partial stress drop is a widespread phenomenon across all event types. This observation implies higher energy at higher frequencies than expected for an ω 2 frequency decay in the source spectra (Brune, 1976), potentially leading to underestimation of expected damaging accelerations. Our observations underscore the complexity of stress dynamics during earthquakes, with potential implications for energy release and damaging effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Seismology
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-025-10286-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress differences and their role in identifying earthquake source process properties at different tectonic environments

Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez‐Pérez, Francisco Ramón Zúñiga
2 citations
Journal of Seismology
earthquake and tectonic studies
3.73
article

Stress differences and their role in identifying earthquake source process properties at different tectonic environments

Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez‐Pérez, Francisco Ramón Zúñiga
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigated stress change parameters during ruptures for earthquakes globally with M w ≥ 6.0 from 1991 to 2023. Employing a formulation and alternative graphical method, we analyzed variations between initial and final stresses as compared to frictional stress during rupture. Our goal was to assess the validity of Orowan’s model (final stress equals frictional stress) across different environments, crucial for recurrent source studies. Our findings reveal significant deviations among event types: reverse-type events diverge slightly from Orowan’s model, while normal events show even larger discrepancy. Strike-slip events exhibit a blend of stress difference mechanisms, with around 30% displaying overshoot (final stress smaller than average frictional stress). The partial stress drop (final stress larger than average frictional stress) percentage for reverse and normal types indicates that approximately 21–23% of the available stress for rupture was not relieved. Our results suggest that partial stress drop is a widespread phenomenon across all event types. This observation implies higher energy at higher frequencies than expected for an ω 2 frequency decay in the source spectra (Brune, 1976), potentially leading to underestimation of expected damaging accelerations. Our observations underscore the complexity of stress dynamics during earthquakes, with potential implications for energy release and damaging effects.

Journal of SeismologyVol. 29(2)
Secretaría de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
earthquake and tectonic studies
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.