Item analysis of type “A” multiple choice questions of biochemistry in GIM module, year 1 MBBS program

Background: Medical education is continually evolving to meet the demands of healthcare and scientific advancements. The Defence Services Medical Academy (DSMA) in Myanmar implemented an outcome-based curriculum in 2017. The genetics, immunology, and molecular medicine (GIM) module is a critical component of the first-year MBBS program, laying the foundation for knowledge in biochemistry and related sciences. Methods: This study analyzed the quality of type “A” multiple choice questions (MCQs)- 28 items from the Biochemistry section of the GIM module’s end-module assessment. The evaluation focused on four key indices: difficulty index (P), discrimination index (D), distractor efficiency (DE), and Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (KR-20) for reliability. Results: Of the 28 items, 21 (75%) were classified as having average difficulty, while 5 (18%) were deemed too difficult. Regarding discrimination, 12 (43%) items displayed very good discrimination, while 8 (29%) had poor discrimination, indicating the need for revision. Nearly 70% of the MCQs had fully functional distractors. Overall, the Biochemistry questions showed moderate reliability (KR-20 score =0.682), with three items (11%) recommended for rejection due to poor performance. Conclusions: These findings highlight the necessity of regular item analysis and revision to ensure the quality and fairness of assessments. Faculty development and active learning strategies are essential to improving the overall reliability and effectiveness of MCQs in medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20250957
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Item analysis of type “A” multiple choice questions of biochemistry in GIM module, year 1 MBBS program

Mo Mo Than, Ye Phyo Aung, Yan Naing Soe
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Item analysis of type “A” multiple choice questions of biochemistry in GIM module, year 1 MBBS program

Mo Mo Than, Ye Phyo Aung, Yan Naing Soe
article en

Abstract

Background: Medical education is continually evolving to meet the demands of healthcare and scientific advancements. The Defence Services Medical Academy (DSMA) in Myanmar implemented an outcome-based curriculum in 2017. The genetics, immunology, and molecular medicine (GIM) module is a critical component of the first-year MBBS program, laying the foundation for knowledge in biochemistry and related sciences. Methods: This study analyzed the quality of type “A” multiple choice questions (MCQs)- 28 items from the Biochemistry section of the GIM module’s end-module assessment. The evaluation focused on four key indices: difficulty index (P), discrimination index (D), distractor efficiency (DE), and Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (KR-20) for reliability. Results: Of the 28 items, 21 (75%) were classified as having average difficulty, while 5 (18%) were deemed too difficult. Regarding discrimination, 12 (43%) items displayed very good discrimination, while 8 (29%) had poor discrimination, indicating the need for revision. Nearly 70% of the MCQs had fully functional distractors. Overall, the Biochemistry questions showed moderate reliability (KR-20 score =0.682), with three items (11%) recommended for rejection due to poor performance. Conclusions: These findings highlight the necessity of regular item analysis and revision to ensure the quality and fairness of assessments. Faculty development and active learning strategies are essential to improving the overall reliability and effectiveness of MCQs in medical education.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 13(4)
Myanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit (MM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.