Structures of feeling in the affective economies of renting in the Majority World: An interpretative synthesis of qualitative research

• The concept of Structures of Feeling is used to explore landlords’ and tenants’ experiences. • An Interpretative Synthesis of 40 qualitative academic publications is conducted. • I propose the tripartite configuration of Greed and Exploitation, Ethics of Care, and Cruel Optimism. • Their multiple instantiations in different historical presents in the Majority World are discussed. • I suggest the tripartite configuration proposed has a broader currency to social sciences. Recent interest in private rented housing seen as a structural mechanism generator of inequalities of wealth, health and wellbeing has been dominated by accounts of tenants’ and landlords’ experiences in the Minority World. Advancing an interpretative synthesis of qualitative research focused on the understudied Majority World, hence a triple hermeneutic process of interpretation, this paper mobilizes Raymond Williams’ concept of ‘structures of feeling’ as a lens through which to engage with and better understand tenants’ and landlords’ experiences of renting in the different historical contexts of Eastern Europe, Western Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Drawing on three different theoretical routes, I develop a tripartite conceptualization of three structures of feeling – greed and exploitation, ethics of care, and cruel optimism – which inform my interpretative journey of substantiating the rich social tapestry of the affective economies of renting across 40 reviewed papers. Of a broader currency to housing and social policy studies, this theoretical interpretation shows that the affective economies of private renting are not only shaped by socioeconomic, political, regulatory or material structures but also by vivid structures of feeling that shape lived experiences in their own right as well as through their capacities of affecting those other structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104268
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structures of feeling in the affective economies of renting in the Majority World: An interpretative synthesis of qualitative research

Adriana Mihaela Soaita
4 citations
Geoforum
Urban Planning and Governance
24.71
article

Structures of feeling in the affective economies of renting in the Majority World: An interpretative synthesis of qualitative research

Adriana Mihaela Soaita
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• The concept of Structures of Feeling is used to explore landlords’ and tenants’ experiences. • An Interpretative Synthesis of 40 qualitative academic publications is conducted. • I propose the tripartite configuration of Greed and Exploitation, Ethics of Care, and Cruel Optimism. • Their multiple instantiations in different historical presents in the Majority World are discussed. • I suggest the tripartite configuration proposed has a broader currency to social sciences. Recent interest in private rented housing seen as a structural mechanism generator of inequalities of wealth, health and wellbeing has been dominated by accounts of tenants’ and landlords’ experiences in the Minority World. Advancing an interpretative synthesis of qualitative research focused on the understudied Majority World, hence a triple hermeneutic process of interpretation, this paper mobilizes Raymond Williams’ concept of ‘structures of feeling’ as a lens through which to engage with and better understand tenants’ and landlords’ experiences of renting in the different historical contexts of Eastern Europe, Western Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Drawing on three different theoretical routes, I develop a tripartite conceptualization of three structures of feeling – greed and exploitation, ethics of care, and cruel optimism – which inform my interpretative journey of substantiating the rich social tapestry of the affective economies of renting across 40 reviewed papers. Of a broader currency to housing and social policy studies, this theoretical interpretation shows that the affective economies of private renting are not only shaped by socioeconomic, political, regulatory or material structures but also by vivid structures of feeling that shape lived experiences in their own right as well as through their capacities of affecting those other structures.

GeoforumVol. 161
University of Bucharest (RO), University of Glasgow (GB)
European Commission, University of Glasgow, Universitatea din București, Horizon 2020, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Urban Planning and Governance
24.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.