Beyond Development: Challenges in Deploying Machine-Learning Models for Structural Engineering Applications

Machine learning (ML) solutions are rapidly changing the landscape of many fields, including structural engineering. Despite their promising performance, these approaches are usually only demonstrated as proofs of concept in structural engineering, and are rarely deployed for real-world applications. This paper illustrates the challenges of developing ML models suitable for deployment with a focus on generalizability and explainability. Among various pitfalls, the paper discusses the impact of model overfitting, underfitting, and underspecification, training data non-representativeness, variable omission bias, and possible shortcomings of conventional cross-validation and feature importance–based explainability for correlated random variables. Two structural engineering–specific illustrative examples highlight the importance of implementing rigorous model validation techniques through adaptive sampling, careful physics-informed feature selection, and considerations of both model complexity and generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-13301
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Development: Challenges in Deploying Machine-Learning Models for Structural Engineering Applications

Henry V. Burton, Brennan Bean, Mohannad Zeyad Naser, Mohsen Zaker Esteghamati
10 citations
Journal of Structural Engineering
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
8.58
article

Beyond Development: Challenges in Deploying Machine-Learning Models for Structural Engineering Applications

Henry V. Burton, Brennan Bean, Mohannad Zeyad Naser, Mohsen Zaker Esteghamati
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) solutions are rapidly changing the landscape of many fields, including structural engineering. Despite their promising performance, these approaches are usually only demonstrated as proofs of concept in structural engineering, and are rarely deployed for real-world applications. This paper illustrates the challenges of developing ML models suitable for deployment with a focus on generalizability and explainability. Among various pitfalls, the paper discusses the impact of model overfitting, underfitting, and underspecification, training data non-representativeness, variable omission bias, and possible shortcomings of conventional cross-validation and feature importance–based explainability for correlated random variables. Two structural engineering–specific illustrative examples highlight the importance of implementing rigorous model validation techniques through adaptive sampling, careful physics-informed feature selection, and considerations of both model complexity and generalizability.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 151(6)
Utah State University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Clemson University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.