Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Linguistically Compare Test Translations: A Methodological Introduction and Demonstration

The validity and utility of translated instruments (psychological measures) depend on the quality of their translation, and differences in key linguistic characteristics could introduce bias. Likewise, linguistic differences between instruments designed to measure analogous constructs might contribute to similar instruments possessing dissimilar psychometrics. This article introduces and demonstrates the use of natural language processing (NLP), a subfield of artificial intelligence, to linguistically analyze 13 translations of two psychological measures previously translated into numerous languages. NLP was used to generate estimates reflecting specific linguistic characteristics of test items (emotional tone/intensity, sentiment, valence, arousal, and dominance), which were then compared across translations at both the test- and item-level, as well as between the two instruments. Results revealed that key linguistic characteristics can profoundly vary both within and between tests. Following a discussion of results, the current limitations of this approach are summarized and strategies for advancing this methodology are proposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assessment
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251326371
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Linguistically Compare Test Translations: A Methodological Introduction and Demonstration

Adam P. Natoli
2 citations
Assessment
Mental Health via Writing
4.88
article

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Linguistically Compare Test Translations: A Methodological Introduction and Demonstration

Adam P. Natoli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The validity and utility of translated instruments (psychological measures) depend on the quality of their translation, and differences in key linguistic characteristics could introduce bias. Likewise, linguistic differences between instruments designed to measure analogous constructs might contribute to similar instruments possessing dissimilar psychometrics. This article introduces and demonstrates the use of natural language processing (NLP), a subfield of artificial intelligence, to linguistically analyze 13 translations of two psychological measures previously translated into numerous languages. NLP was used to generate estimates reflecting specific linguistic characteristics of test items (emotional tone/intensity, sentiment, valence, arousal, and dominance), which were then compared across translations at both the test- and item-level, as well as between the two instruments. Results revealed that key linguistic characteristics can profoundly vary both within and between tests. Following a discussion of results, the current limitations of this approach are summarized and strategies for advancing this methodology are proposed.

AssessmentVol. 33(2)
Sam Houston State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health via Writing
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Linguistically Compare Test Translations: A Methodological Introduction and Demonstration — Adam P. Natoli · Assessment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS