Online resources and educational materials relating to autism spectrum disorder

Objective: To evaluate the quality, understandability, actionability and readability of English-language Internet-based resources about autism spectrum disorder. Design: Cross-sectional observational study evaluating the quality, accountability, understandability, actionability and readability of English-language Internet-based resources related to autism spectrum disorder. Setting: The study was conducted using publicly available webpages accessed through Google and Yahoo search engines, identified based on search terms relevant to autism spectrum disorder, as determined by Google Trends and SEMRUSH data. Data collection occurred in March 2023. Method: Google Trends was used to identify the terms most likely searched by consumers when looking for information related to autism. The HON, URAC, JAMA benchmark criteria and the DISCERN instrument were used to evaluate webpage quality and accountability. We used the PEMAT-P to evaluate webpage understandability and actionability. The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were used to evaluate webpage readability. Results: In total, 103 webpages were analysed. Nine webpages displayed the HON seal. Six webpages met all core JAMA standards, 23 met three core standards, 35 met one core standard and six met none of the core standards. DISCERN scores ranged from 16 to 53 ( Mdn = 33.00; IQR = 41.00–27.00). PEMAT-P understandability and actionability scores were 8.52 ± 2.10 and 1.30 ± 1.04, respectively. Readability scores, on average, exceeded the recommended grade reading levels (FRE = 27.00 ± 12.19, F-KGL = 15.20 ± 2.32, FOG = 12.70 ± 2.09 and SMOG = 15.70 ± 1.78). Conclusion: Most webpages did not meet the criteria for quality, understandability, actionability and readability. The developers of websites aimed at autistic persons and their care partners should consider the findings of this study when developing patient education materials. Doing so will facilitate improved communication with healthcare consumers, resulting in improved outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Education Journal
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969251328913
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online resources and educational materials relating to autism spectrum disorder

Richard I. Zraick, Nancy S. McIntyre, Bonnie K. Slavych, Catherine Oliver
2 citations
Health Education Journal
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
2.86
article

Online resources and educational materials relating to autism spectrum disorder

Richard I. Zraick, Nancy S. McIntyre, Bonnie K. Slavych, Catherine Oliver
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the quality, understandability, actionability and readability of English-language Internet-based resources about autism spectrum disorder. Design: Cross-sectional observational study evaluating the quality, accountability, understandability, actionability and readability of English-language Internet-based resources related to autism spectrum disorder. Setting: The study was conducted using publicly available webpages accessed through Google and Yahoo search engines, identified based on search terms relevant to autism spectrum disorder, as determined by Google Trends and SEMRUSH data. Data collection occurred in March 2023. Method: Google Trends was used to identify the terms most likely searched by consumers when looking for information related to autism. The HON, URAC, JAMA benchmark criteria and the DISCERN instrument were used to evaluate webpage quality and accountability. We used the PEMAT-P to evaluate webpage understandability and actionability. The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were used to evaluate webpage readability. Results: In total, 103 webpages were analysed. Nine webpages displayed the HON seal. Six webpages met all core JAMA standards, 23 met three core standards, 35 met one core standard and six met none of the core standards. DISCERN scores ranged from 16 to 53 ( Mdn = 33.00; IQR = 41.00–27.00). PEMAT-P understandability and actionability scores were 8.52 ± 2.10 and 1.30 ± 1.04, respectively. Readability scores, on average, exceeded the recommended grade reading levels (FRE = 27.00 ± 12.19, F-KGL = 15.20 ± 2.32, FOG = 12.70 ± 2.09 and SMOG = 15.70 ± 1.78). Conclusion: Most webpages did not meet the criteria for quality, understandability, actionability and readability. The developers of websites aimed at autistic persons and their care partners should consider the findings of this study when developing patient education materials. Doing so will facilitate improved communication with healthcare consumers, resulting in improved outcomes.

Health Education JournalVol. 84(5)
University of Central Florida (US), Missouri State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.