Comparative Analysis of Community Engagement Frameworks in Rural Art Interventions: A Multidimensional Evaluation of Yim Tin Tsai Village, Hong Kong

This interdisciplinary study examines community participation mechanisms in rural art interventions through the case of Yim Tin Tsai Village, Hong Kong. Employing a mixed-methods approach combining archival analysis and field observations, we comparatively assess three engagement frameworks: hierarchical governance, grassroots mobilization, and hybrid collaborative models. The research develops a Cultural Sensitivity-Resource Endowment (CS-RE) evaluation matrix to analyze intervention outcomes. Findings indicate that the hybrid model, operationalized through "expert guidance-community agency-institutional scaffolding" mechanisms, demonstrates superior performance in project implementation continuity, cultural authenticity preservation, and stakeholder satisfaction. The study contributes theoretical insights to participatory design literature while providing practical implications for sustainable rural revitalization strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of innovation and development
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/2zbpgt12
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Community Engagement Frameworks in Rural Art Interventions: A Multidimensional Evaluation of Yim Tin Tsai Village, Hong Kong

Xingquan Zhao
Journal of innovation and development
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Comparative Analysis of Community Engagement Frameworks in Rural Art Interventions: A Multidimensional Evaluation of Yim Tin Tsai Village, Hong Kong

Xingquan Zhao
article en

Abstract

This interdisciplinary study examines community participation mechanisms in rural art interventions through the case of Yim Tin Tsai Village, Hong Kong. Employing a mixed-methods approach combining archival analysis and field observations, we comparatively assess three engagement frameworks: hierarchical governance, grassroots mobilization, and hybrid collaborative models. The research develops a Cultural Sensitivity-Resource Endowment (CS-RE) evaluation matrix to analyze intervention outcomes. Findings indicate that the hybrid model, operationalized through "expert guidance-community agency-institutional scaffolding" mechanisms, demonstrates superior performance in project implementation continuity, cultural authenticity preservation, and stakeholder satisfaction. The study contributes theoretical insights to participatory design literature while providing practical implications for sustainable rural revitalization strategies.

Journal of innovation and developmentVol. 10(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.