Presenting return charts in investment decisions

An investment’s performance is often represented through charts, which are key components in making informed investment decisions but allow for discretion in how the information is presented. In a controlled, incentivized experiment that models an advisor–client setting, we specifically study the discretion in the charts’ vertical axis scale. Our findings reveal that advisors tend to present positive returns on a comparatively narrow scale – thereby enhancing the size of the return bars – while no distinct pattern is observed for negative returns. Advisors’ scaling choices do not vary with different incentive schemes. For positive returns, chosen scales are positively related to advisors’ forecasts. We therefore find no evidence that advisors use the chart’s axis scale to visually emphasize or de-emphasize investment performance in a strategic manner. Additionally, investors’ decisions and forecasts are not affected by different scales. This study extends the existing literature by exploring an interactive advisor–client setting and contributes to our understanding of how return information is presented in investment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101040
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Presenting return charts in investment decisions

Julia Rose, Christoph Huber
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
article

Presenting return charts in investment decisions

Julia Rose, Christoph Huber
article en

Abstract

An investment’s performance is often represented through charts, which are key components in making informed investment decisions but allow for discretion in how the information is presented. In a controlled, incentivized experiment that models an advisor–client setting, we specifically study the discretion in the charts’ vertical axis scale. Our findings reveal that advisors tend to present positive returns on a comparatively narrow scale – thereby enhancing the size of the return bars – while no distinct pattern is observed for negative returns. Advisors’ scaling choices do not vary with different incentive schemes. For positive returns, chosen scales are positively related to advisors’ forecasts. We therefore find no evidence that advisors use the chart’s axis scale to visually emphasize or de-emphasize investment performance in a strategic manner. Additionally, investors’ decisions and forecasts are not affected by different scales. This study extends the existing literature by exploring an interactive advisor–client setting and contributes to our understanding of how return information is presented in investment decisions.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental FinanceVol. 46
Tinbergen Institute (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), Aalto University (FI)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.