Contrasting the Marine Biogeochemical Cycles of Iron and Scandium in the California Current System

Abstract The oceanic biogeochemical cycling of iron is globally important yet difficult to fully understand due to the many chemical processes involved. There is potential to use scandium, which has a similar ionic size and charge density to trivalent iron but lacks redox cycling, as a simpler analog for specific parts of the iron cycle, if we can sufficiently develop our understanding of scandium's reactivity. Here we move closer to this understanding. We look at particle reactivity and solubility through a 24‐hr incubation experiment: 5 nmol/kg of dissolved scandium and/or iron were added to filtered and unfiltered California Current System water. Particulate scandium formed only in the unfiltered treatments, at a quantity unlikely to have been taken up biologically. This is the first direct observation of scavenging of scandium, an attribute shared with iron. Our results also serve as the first test of scandium solubility in seawater: 1.9 nmol/kg of dissolved scandium was stable in the filtered treatment, 50 times more than the highest natural concentrations so far observed. This indicates that, in contrast to iron, scandium's oceanic cycling is unlikely to be influenced by solubility limits. We also compare particulate depth profiles: labile particulate iron was disproportionally higher than that of scandium in shelf‐influenced samples, likely due to iron reductively dissolving in the sediments, which scandium cannot do, and then precipitating in oxic seawater. Due to this combination of behaviors, our results suggest that paired observations of scandium and iron may help distinguish between iron sourced from sediment resuspension and reductive dissolution.