Alternative stones and cleaning efficiencies for historical building stones used in İstanbul (Türkiye)

Historical buildings are important part of the common heritage of mankind. İstanbul comprises many historical buildings built by geo-materials. A limestone (named as Küfeki stone in the region) is one of the most widely used stone in and around the city since thousands of years. The durability, excavability and workability of the stone attract the usage of this stone. Besides the outcrops of the rock were very common. Unfortunately, nowadays quarries and outcrops of Küfeki stone are totally abandoned due to dense settlement. For this reason, replacement of damaged or polluted stone with the original stone is a hard task to overcome. There are some rock types around the city with similar physical properties but the durability of the stone may not match the appropriate values as a substitute. The study aims to define appropriate substitute stone and effect of cleaning on original and alternative stones. For this purpose, micro-textural, physical and mechanical studies and durability tests were conducted on each alternative and original stone regarding EN standards including at least five samples for each group. Same stones were then subjected to pollutant effects. The difference between non-polluted stones and polluted stones were compared regarding changes in mass and visual appearance. Additionally, two widely used cleaning techniques (i.e. sand blasting and laser cleaning) were applied on these stones. The results showed that the water absorption by capillarity and P-wave velocity tests provide useful data for quick decision to understand the durability of studied rocks. But it is clear that due to micro-textural variations durability tests must be conducted on each sampling level for substitute stone selection. Results also revealed that load bearing stones should be cleaned using laser cleaning or other non-destructive method. And sand blasting can be used in non-load bearing structural elements of historical buildings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0985.1969
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternative stones and cleaning efficiencies for historical building stones used in İstanbul (Türkiye)

Ahmet Güleç, Tuğçe Erözmen, Ömer Ündül, Namık Aysal
1 citations
TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
Building materials and conservation
1.67
article

Alternative stones and cleaning efficiencies for historical building stones used in İstanbul (Türkiye)

Ahmet Güleç, Tuğçe Erözmen, Ömer Ündül, Namık Aysal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Historical buildings are important part of the common heritage of mankind. İstanbul comprises many historical buildings built by geo-materials. A limestone (named as Küfeki stone in the region) is one of the most widely used stone in and around the city since thousands of years. The durability, excavability and workability of the stone attract the usage of this stone. Besides the outcrops of the rock were very common. Unfortunately, nowadays quarries and outcrops of Küfeki stone are totally abandoned due to dense settlement. For this reason, replacement of damaged or polluted stone with the original stone is a hard task to overcome. There are some rock types around the city with similar physical properties but the durability of the stone may not match the appropriate values as a substitute. The study aims to define appropriate substitute stone and effect of cleaning on original and alternative stones. For this purpose, micro-textural, physical and mechanical studies and durability tests were conducted on each alternative and original stone regarding EN standards including at least five samples for each group. Same stones were then subjected to pollutant effects. The difference between non-polluted stones and polluted stones were compared regarding changes in mass and visual appearance. Additionally, two widely used cleaning techniques (i.e. sand blasting and laser cleaning) were applied on these stones. The results showed that the water absorption by capillarity and P-wave velocity tests provide useful data for quick decision to understand the durability of studied rocks. But it is clear that due to micro-textural variations durability tests must be conducted on each sampling level for substitute stone selection. Results also revealed that load bearing stones should be cleaned using laser cleaning or other non-destructive method. And sand blasting can be used in non-load bearing structural elements of historical buildings.

TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCESVol. 34(3)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Building materials and conservation
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.