Evaluation and Bias Analysis of Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic Electronic Health Records: Comparative Study

Larger models, such as Yi-34B, Qwen-14B, and Llama 2 to 13 B, showed improved performance in generating more comprehensive EHRs, as reflected in higher EPS values. However, this increased performance was accompanied by a notable escalation in both gender and racial biases, highlighting a performance-bias trade-off. The study identified 4 key findings as follows: (1) as model size increased, EHR generation improved, but demographic biases also became more pronounced; (2) biases were observed across all models, not just the larger ones; (3) gender bias closely aligned with real-world disease prevalence, while racial bias was evident in only a subset of diseases; and (4) racial biases varied, with some diseases showing overrepresentation of White or Black populations and underrepresentation of Hispanic and Asian groups. These findings underline the need for effective bias mitigation strategies and the development of benchmarks to ensure fairness in artificial intelligence applications for health care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/65317
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and Bias Analysis of Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic Electronic Health Records: Comparative Study

Jingbao Kan, Yanan Yuan, Xin Wei, Honghan Wu et al.
2 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Machine Learning in Healthcare
4.96
article

Evaluation and Bias Analysis of Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic Electronic Health Records: Comparative Study

Jingbao Kan, Yanan Yuan, Xin Wei, Honghan Wu, Yun Liu, Cheng Wan, Changwei Zhang, Yifan Xu, Ruochen Huang, Hao Qian, Shan Lu, Xin Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Larger models, such as Yi-34B, Qwen-14B, and Llama 2 to 13 B, showed improved performance in generating more comprehensive EHRs, as reflected in higher EPS values. However, this increased performance was accompanied by a notable escalation in both gender and racial biases, highlighting a performance-bias trade-off. The study identified 4 key findings as follows: (1) as model size increased, EHR generation improved, but demographic biases also became more pronounced; (2) biases were observed across all models, not just the larger ones; (3) gender bias closely aligned with real-world disease prevalence, while racial bias was evident in only a subset of diseases; and (4) racial biases varied, with some diseases showing overrepresentation of White or Black populations and underrepresentation of Hispanic and Asian groups. These findings underline the need for effective bias mitigation strategies and the development of benchmarks to ensure fairness in artificial intelligence applications for health care.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), Purple Mountain Laboratories (CN), University College London (GB), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.