Numerical and experimental determination of the forming limit curves of AA6061 using the modified GTN damage model

The current research presents an experimental and numerical investigation of the forming limit of ECARed (Equal Channel Angular Rolling) 6061 aluminum alloy using a modified Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) failure model. Additionally, to achieve more precise results, Hill's second-degree anisotropic yield criterion with shear loading terms was employed instead of the Von Mises isotropic yield criterion, representing another innovative aspect of this research. The parameters associated with Hill's yield criterion were calculated using Lankford's coefficients (r0, r45, and r90), which can be derived from uniaxial tensile tests conducted at angles of 0, 45, and 90 degrees relative to the rolling direction. The GTN parameters were determined by minimizing the difference between experimental and numerical results from standard tensile tests. Following the calibration of the modified GTN model, spherical head expansion tests were conducted to derive forming limit curves. Finite element method (FEM) was also performed using the developed GTN failure model, and the results were compared with experimental data. The findings demonstrate a favorable agreement with an error of less than 5% between the experimental results and the numerical predictions obtained from the modified GTN failure model. Also, the results show that the use of Hill's second-degree anisotropic yield criterion compared to Von Mises isotropic in the GTN failure model is more consistent with the experimental results and has higher accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089251325346
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical and experimental determination of the forming limit curves of AA6061 using the modified GTN damage model

Farid Reza Biglari, Amir Reza Gharib
3 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
2.14
article

Numerical and experimental determination of the forming limit curves of AA6061 using the modified GTN damage model

Farid Reza Biglari, Amir Reza Gharib
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The current research presents an experimental and numerical investigation of the forming limit of ECARed (Equal Channel Angular Rolling) 6061 aluminum alloy using a modified Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) failure model. Additionally, to achieve more precise results, Hill's second-degree anisotropic yield criterion with shear loading terms was employed instead of the Von Mises isotropic yield criterion, representing another innovative aspect of this research. The parameters associated with Hill's yield criterion were calculated using Lankford's coefficients (r0, r45, and r90), which can be derived from uniaxial tensile tests conducted at angles of 0, 45, and 90 degrees relative to the rolling direction. The GTN parameters were determined by minimizing the difference between experimental and numerical results from standard tensile tests. Following the calibration of the modified GTN model, spherical head expansion tests were conducted to derive forming limit curves. Finite element method (FEM) was also performed using the developed GTN failure model, and the results were compared with experimental data. The findings demonstrate a favorable agreement with an error of less than 5% between the experimental results and the numerical predictions obtained from the modified GTN failure model. Also, the results show that the use of Hill's second-degree anisotropic yield criterion compared to Von Mises isotropic in the GTN failure model is more consistent with the experimental results and has higher accuracy.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.