A prospective analysis of efficacy of dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic regimens in high and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy

ObjectivesMultiple moderate-to-severe side effects associated with dexamethasone (DEX) were observed by patients undergoing a multi-day DEX regimen for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Therefore, there is increasing demand in clinical practice to lower DEX doses in subsequent emetogenic treatment cycles. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the DEX-sparing antiemetic regimens in high- and moderate- emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC, MEC respectively) and to explore its functional impact on health-related Quality of Life (QoL).Materials and methodsThis is a prospective, observational study that includes 91 patients who received HEC and MEC with DEX. We evaluated the percentage of complete response and complete control of CINV in acute phases (<24 h) and delayed phases (25-120 h). The Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE), a 5-day recall tool, was used to evaluate the functional impact of DEX-sparing regimens on health-related QoL. Nausea and vomiting were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.Statistical analysisThe SPSS version 20.0 was used for the statistical analysis. In the descriptive analysis, the study's parameters were analyzed and their mean (±SD), percentage, and frequency were determined.ResultsIn terms of overall efficacy, the DEX sparing was 86.36% in complete control and 90.91% in complete response. In the CTCAE version 5.0 analyses, only 1.1% of cases were reported with a Grade 3, and none with a Grade 4 or Grade 5. The FLIE score was above 54 in each domain, indicating no impact of CINV on daily life.ConclusionThe use of DEX-sparing antiemetic regimens in clinical settings, which can be better tolerated by patients, is made clear by this study. Consequently, our findings guide clinicians to optimize the use of DEX to preserve anti-emetic efficacy throughout the scheduled cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251330811
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective analysis of efficacy of dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic regimens in high and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy

R. Kannan, Natarajan Viswanathan, Harish Kamaraj, Ardhra Jiju et al.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Nausea and vomiting management
article

A prospective analysis of efficacy of dexamethasone-sparing antiemetic regimens in high and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy

R. Kannan, Natarajan Viswanathan, Harish Kamaraj, Ardhra Jiju, R V Viknesh, Velusamy Premsundari
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesMultiple moderate-to-severe side effects associated with dexamethasone (DEX) were observed by patients undergoing a multi-day DEX regimen for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Therefore, there is increasing demand in clinical practice to lower DEX doses in subsequent emetogenic treatment cycles. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the DEX-sparing antiemetic regimens in high- and moderate- emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC, MEC respectively) and to explore its functional impact on health-related Quality of Life (QoL).Materials and methodsThis is a prospective, observational study that includes 91 patients who received HEC and MEC with DEX. We evaluated the percentage of complete response and complete control of CINV in acute phases (<24 h) and delayed phases (25-120 h). The Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE), a 5-day recall tool, was used to evaluate the functional impact of DEX-sparing regimens on health-related QoL. Nausea and vomiting were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.Statistical analysisThe SPSS version 20.0 was used for the statistical analysis. In the descriptive analysis, the study's parameters were analyzed and their mean (±SD), percentage, and frequency were determined.ResultsIn terms of overall efficacy, the DEX sparing was 86.36% in complete control and 90.91% in complete response. In the CTCAE version 5.0 analyses, only 1.1% of cases were reported with a Grade 3, and none with a Grade 4 or Grade 5. The FLIE score was above 54 in each domain, indicating no impact of CINV on daily life.ConclusionThe use of DEX-sparing antiemetic regimens in clinical settings, which can be better tolerated by patients, is made clear by this study. Consequently, our findings guide clinicians to optimize the use of DEX to preserve anti-emetic efficacy throughout the scheduled cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Kovai Medical Center and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.