Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A CAN-BIND-1 Study Report: Analyse des résultats du traitement antidépresseur à l’aide des scores de risque polygéniques : Rapport sur l’étude CAN-BIND-1

ObjectiveThe genetic architecture of antidepressant response is poorly understood. This study investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for major psychiatric disorders and a personality trait (neuroticism) are associated with antidepressant treatment outcomes.MethodsWe analysed 148 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network for Depression-1 (CAN-BIND-1) cohort. Participants initially received escitalopram (ESC) monotherapy for 8 weeks. Nonresponders at week 8 received augmentation with aripiprazole (ARI), while responders continued ESC until week 16. Primary outcomes were remission status and symptom improvement measured at weeks 8 and 16. At week 16, post-hoc stratified analyses were performed by treatment arm (ESC-only vs. ESC + ARI). Eleven PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies of psychiatric disorders (e.g., MDD and post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD)) and neuroticism, were analysed for associations with these outcomes using logistic and linear regression models.ResultsAt week 8, a higher PRS for PTSD was nominally associated with a lower probability of remission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.08 [0.014-0.42], empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.017) and reduced symptom improvement (beta (standard error) = -29.15 (9.76), empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.019). Similarly, a higher PRS for MDD was nominally associated with decreased remission probability (OR = 0.38 [0.18-0.78], empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.044). However, none of the results survived multiple testing corrections. At week 16, the stratified analysis for the ESC-only group revealed that a higher PRS for MDD was associated with increased remission probability (empirical <i>p-</i>value = 0.034) and greater symptom improvement (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.02). In contrast, higher PRSs for schizophrenia (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.013) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.032) were associated with lower symptom improvement. No significant associations were observed in the ESC + ARI group.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that PRSs may influence treatment outcomes, particularly in ESC monotherapy. Replication in larger studies is needed to validate these observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251329073
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A CAN-BIND-1 Study Report: Analyse des résultats du traitement antidépresseur à l’aide des scores de risque polygéniques : Rapport sur l’étude CAN-BIND-1

Gustavo Turecki, Pierre Blier, Faranak Farzan, Daniel Mueller et al.
1 citations
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Treatment of Major Depression
1.39
article

Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A CAN-BIND-1 Study Report: Analyse des résultats du traitement antidépresseur à l’aide des scores de risque polygéniques : Rapport sur l’étude CAN-BIND-1

Gustavo Turecki, Pierre Blier, Faranak Farzan, Daniel Mueller, Sagar V. Parikh, Susan Rotzinger, Jane Allyson Foster, Samar S. M. Elsheikh, Martin Kronenbuerger, Rudolf Uher, Roumen Milev, Emytis Tavakoli, Sidney H. Kennedy, Stefan M. Kloiber, Victoria Marshe, Benicio Noronha Frey, Farhana Islam, Stefanie Hassel, Franca Placenza, Xiaoyu Men, Valerie H. Taylor, Leen Magarbeh, Raymond W. Lam, Francesco Leri, Claudio N. Soares
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveThe genetic architecture of antidepressant response is poorly understood. This study investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for major psychiatric disorders and a personality trait (neuroticism) are associated with antidepressant treatment outcomes.MethodsWe analysed 148 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network for Depression-1 (CAN-BIND-1) cohort. Participants initially received escitalopram (ESC) monotherapy for 8 weeks. Nonresponders at week 8 received augmentation with aripiprazole (ARI), while responders continued ESC until week 16. Primary outcomes were remission status and symptom improvement measured at weeks 8 and 16. At week 16, post-hoc stratified analyses were performed by treatment arm (ESC-only vs. ESC + ARI). Eleven PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies of psychiatric disorders (e.g., MDD and post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD)) and neuroticism, were analysed for associations with these outcomes using logistic and linear regression models.ResultsAt week 8, a higher PRS for PTSD was nominally associated with a lower probability of remission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.08 [0.014-0.42], empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.017) and reduced symptom improvement (beta (standard error) = -29.15 (9.76), empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.019). Similarly, a higher PRS for MDD was nominally associated with decreased remission probability (OR = 0.38 [0.18-0.78], empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.044). However, none of the results survived multiple testing corrections. At week 16, the stratified analysis for the ESC-only group revealed that a higher PRS for MDD was associated with increased remission probability (empirical <i>p-</i>value = 0.034) and greater symptom improvement (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.02). In contrast, higher PRSs for schizophrenia (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.013) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.032) were associated with lower symptom improvement. No significant associations were observed in the ESC + ARI group.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that PRSs may influence treatment outcomes, particularly in ESC monotherapy. Replication in larger studies is needed to validate these observations.

The Canadian Journal of PsychiatryVol. 70(7)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Dalhousie University (CA), University Health Network (CA), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), University of Michigan (US), Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Southwestern Medical Center (US), McGill University (CA), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA), University of Guelph (CA), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), McMaster University (CA)
Ontario Brain Institute, Lundbeck Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Treatment of Major Depression
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.