Using a Dose-Response Approach on the Growth of Food–Borne Pathogens in Feces of Cattle Fed Three Different Direct-Fed Rations Reveals the Efficacy of Lactobacillus salivarius L28

In the past two decades, the use of probiotics in livestock production has significantly increased. Direct-fed microbials (DFMs) have become popular in beef cattle production due to consumer demand for more natural meat alternatives. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the dose-response of L28 at concentrations of 6, 7, and 8 log CFU/mL to inhibit the growth of STEC and S. enterica in cattle manure, and (2) assess tylosin and monensin in cattle manure and the efficacy of L28 in pathogen inhibition. Fecal samples were collected from cattle fed three different rations: (1) monensin and tylosin (MONTY), (2) monensin with L28 (MONPRO), and (3) no L28, tylosin or monensin (BASE). Sterilized fecal samples were inoculated with a cocktail mixture of three Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) or Salmonella enterica (S. enterica) strains to an initial concentration of 3.0-4.0 log CFU/g. To evaluate the dose-response, Lactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) L28 was applied at concentrations of 6, 7, and 8 log CFU/ml. For S. enterica, the (BASE) ration had a significant treatment time effect at 12 h and 24 h with L28 at a dose of 8 log CFU (p = 0.01, p = 0.03). For STECs, the (BASE) had a similar effect, however, not significant for 24 h (p = 0.7). A dose of 8 log CFU/mL reduced S. enterica growth in manure samples by 1.3-4.2 log CFU/g compared to BASE. While L. salivarius does not completely prevent bacterial growth, it effectively reduces foodborne pathogens. Using L. salivarius in beef products offers a natural alternative to antibiotics, benefiting both consumers and the beef industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Protection
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100502
Primary Topic
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a Dose-Response Approach on the Growth of Food–Borne Pathogens in Feces of Cattle Fed Three Different Direct-Fed Rations Reveals the Efficacy of Lactobacillus salivarius L28

A.R. English, Erin Castelli, Kendra K. Nightingale, M.M. Brashears et al.
Journal of Food Protection
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
article

Using a Dose-Response Approach on the Growth of Food–Borne Pathogens in Feces of Cattle Fed Three Different Direct-Fed Rations Reveals the Efficacy of Lactobacillus salivarius L28

A.R. English, Erin Castelli, Kendra K. Nightingale, M.M. Brashears, David L. Campos
article en

Abstract

In the past two decades, the use of probiotics in livestock production has significantly increased. Direct-fed microbials (DFMs) have become popular in beef cattle production due to consumer demand for more natural meat alternatives. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the dose-response of L28 at concentrations of 6, 7, and 8 log CFU/mL to inhibit the growth of STEC and S. enterica in cattle manure, and (2) assess tylosin and monensin in cattle manure and the efficacy of L28 in pathogen inhibition. Fecal samples were collected from cattle fed three different rations: (1) monensin and tylosin (MONTY), (2) monensin with L28 (MONPRO), and (3) no L28, tylosin or monensin (BASE). Sterilized fecal samples were inoculated with a cocktail mixture of three Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) or Salmonella enterica (S. enterica) strains to an initial concentration of 3.0-4.0 log CFU/g. To evaluate the dose-response, Lactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) L28 was applied at concentrations of 6, 7, and 8 log CFU/ml. For S. enterica, the (BASE) ration had a significant treatment time effect at 12 h and 24 h with L28 at a dose of 8 log CFU (p = 0.01, p = 0.03). For STECs, the (BASE) had a similar effect, however, not significant for 24 h (p = 0.7). A dose of 8 log CFU/mL reduced S. enterica growth in manure samples by 1.3-4.2 log CFU/g compared to BASE. While L. salivarius does not completely prevent bacterial growth, it effectively reduces foodborne pathogens. Using L. salivarius in beef products offers a natural alternative to antibiotics, benefiting both consumers and the beef industry.

Journal of Food ProtectionVol. 88(6)
Texas Tech University (US), Cargill (Netherlands) (NL), Cargill (United States) (US), Western Regional Research Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.