Is Chivalry Deadly? Contemporary Chivalric Disposition, Christian Knights, and the Third Reich

This paper critically explores the concept of chivalry and its relevance in contemporary social science. Adopting a Nietzschean philosophical perspective, it challenges the assumption that chivalrous values are inherently good and virtuous. A novel framework is introduced conceptualising chivalry as a culturally evolved set of values surrounding fortitude, deference, and virtue, and applied as an interpretive lens to examine the notorious historical case of Nazi Germany in the 1930s. The study qualitatively analyses two educational documents and compares the values they promote with those of medieval knightly orders and the contemporary chivalrous ideals they inspired. Through a compelling selection of revealing quotes, the analysis explicates a disturbing continuity between the Nazi-era values that led to militarism, authoritarianism, idealised racial purity and, ultimately, heinous crimes against humanity, with those we continue to positively regard as chivalrous today. The analysis urges a revaluation of such values, and a more of honour, duty, and virtue. An appeal is ultimately made for substantially more critical academic discourse on chivalry and its broader implications in matters of significant interest to social scientists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.0459
Primary Topic
European history and politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Chivalry Deadly? Contemporary Chivalric Disposition, Christian Knights, and the Third Reich

Matthew Muscat-Inglott
MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice
European history and politics
article

Is Chivalry Deadly? Contemporary Chivalric Disposition, Christian Knights, and the Third Reich

Matthew Muscat-Inglott
article en

Abstract

This paper critically explores the concept of chivalry and its relevance in contemporary social science. Adopting a Nietzschean philosophical perspective, it challenges the assumption that chivalrous values are inherently good and virtuous. A novel framework is introduced conceptualising chivalry as a culturally evolved set of values surrounding fortitude, deference, and virtue, and applied as an interpretive lens to examine the notorious historical case of Nazi Germany in the 1930s. The study qualitatively analyses two educational documents and compares the values they promote with those of medieval knightly orders and the contemporary chivalrous ideals they inspired. Through a compelling selection of revealing quotes, the analysis explicates a disturbing continuity between the Nazi-era values that led to militarism, authoritarianism, idealised racial purity and, ultimately, heinous crimes against humanity, with those we continue to positively regard as chivalrous today. The analysis urges a revaluation of such values, and a more of honour, duty, and virtue. An appeal is ultimately made for substantially more critical academic discourse on chivalry and its broader implications in matters of significant interest to social scientists.

MCAST Journal of Applied Research & PracticeVol. 8(4)
Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology (MT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
European history and politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is Chivalry Deadly? Contemporary Chivalric Disposition, Christian Knights, and the Third Reich — Matthew Muscat-Inglott · MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS