Massively parallel computation in a heterogeneous regime

Abstract Massively-parallel graph algorithms have received extensive attention over the past decade, with research focusing on three memory regimes: the superlinear regime, the near-linear regime, and the sublinear regime. The sublinear regime is the most desirable in practice, but conditional hardness results point towards its limitations. In this work we study a heterogeneous model, where the memory of the machines varies in size. We focus mostly on the heterogeneous setting created by adding a single near-linear machine to the sublinear MPC regime, and show that even a single large machine suffices to circumvent most of the conditional hardness results for the sublinear regime: for graphs with n vertices and m edges, we give (a) an MST algorithm that runs in $$O(\log \log (m/n))$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> rounds; (b) an algorithm that constructs an O ( k )-spanner of size $$O(n^{1+1/k})$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in O (1) rounds; and (c) a maximal-matching algorithm that runs in $$O(\sqrt{\log (m/n)}\log \log (m/n))$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msqrt> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> rounds. We also observe that the best known near-linear MPC algorithms for several other graph problems which are conjectured to be hard in the sublinear regime (minimum cut, maximal independent set, and vertex coloring) can easily be transformed to work in the heterogeneous MPC model with a single near-linear machine, while retaining their original round complexity in the near-linear regime. If the large machine is allowed to have superlinear memory, all of the problems above can be solved in O (1) rounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Distributed Computing
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-025-00479-7
Primary Topic
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Massively parallel computation in a heterogeneous regime

Orr Fischer, Adi Horowitz, Rotem Oshman
Distributed Computing
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
article

Massively parallel computation in a heterogeneous regime

Orr Fischer, Adi Horowitz, Rotem Oshman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Massively-parallel graph algorithms have received extensive attention over the past decade, with research focusing on three memory regimes: the superlinear regime, the near-linear regime, and the sublinear regime. The sublinear regime is the most desirable in practice, but conditional hardness results point towards its limitations. In this work we study a heterogeneous model, where the memory of the machines varies in size. We focus mostly on the heterogeneous setting created by adding a single near-linear machine to the sublinear MPC regime, and show that even a single large machine suffices to circumvent most of the conditional hardness results for the sublinear regime: for graphs with n vertices and m edges, we give (a) an MST algorithm that runs in $$O(\log \log (m/n))$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> rounds; (b) an algorithm that constructs an O ( k )-spanner of size $$O(n^{1+1/k})$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in O (1) rounds; and (c) a maximal-matching algorithm that runs in $$O(\sqrt{\log (m/n)}\log \log (m/n))$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msqrt> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mo>log</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> rounds. We also observe that the best known near-linear MPC algorithms for several other graph problems which are conjectured to be hard in the sublinear regime (minimum cut, maximal independent set, and vertex coloring) can easily be transformed to work in the heterogeneous MPC model with a single near-linear machine, while retaining their original round complexity in the near-linear regime. If the large machine is allowed to have superlinear memory, all of the problems above can be solved in O (1) rounds.

Distributed ComputingVol. 38(3)
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Tel Aviv University (IL)
Bar-Ilan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.