Major Conundrums and Possible Solutions in <scp>DeFi</scp> Insurance

ABSTRACT This paper empirically explores the early development of insurance projects in the decentralised finance (DeFi) industry, which is based on disruptive technologies like blockchain and smart contracts. A brief history of DeFi is narrated, stressing four risks of DeFi (volatility risk, cyberattack risk, liquidity risk, and regulation risk) and its co‐evolution with traditional finance. Then, first‐hand evidence is collected from informed industrial practitioners by two semi‐structured focus group discussions. Consensuses are reached on why the DeFi insurance market is underdeveloped and incomplete (the liquidity conundrum, the actuarial conundrum, the verification conundrum, the scale conundrum, the yield conundrum, the exploitation conundrum, the cybersecurity conundrum, and the regulation conundrum) and how the next generation of DeFi insurance can address these conundrums. Further evidence is obtained to quantify the importance of conundrums using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Building on the qualitative and quantitative findings, a prototypical model of DeFi insurance is proposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3154
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Major Conundrums and Possible Solutions in DeFi Insurance

Peng Zhou, Zhang Ying
1 citations
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.13
article

Major Conundrums and Possible Solutions in DeFi Insurance

Peng Zhou, Zhang Ying
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper empirically explores the early development of insurance projects in the decentralised finance (DeFi) industry, which is based on disruptive technologies like blockchain and smart contracts. A brief history of DeFi is narrated, stressing four risks of DeFi (volatility risk, cyberattack risk, liquidity risk, and regulation risk) and its co‐evolution with traditional finance. Then, first‐hand evidence is collected from informed industrial practitioners by two semi‐structured focus group discussions. Consensuses are reached on why the DeFi insurance market is underdeveloped and incomplete (the liquidity conundrum, the actuarial conundrum, the verification conundrum, the scale conundrum, the yield conundrum, the exploitation conundrum, the cybersecurity conundrum, and the regulation conundrum) and how the next generation of DeFi insurance can address these conundrums. Further evidence is obtained to quantify the importance of conundrums using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Building on the qualitative and quantitative findings, a prototypical model of DeFi insurance is proposed.

International Journal of Finance & EconomicsVol. 31(1)
University of Surrey (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.